IRTR ranks 3rd and GAL 8th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
GAL vs IRTR
IRTR −0.27pt a year
0.35%0.08%
GAL 1.2×the volume
14.7K12.7K
GAL +1.7pt
+14.1%+12.4%
GAL vs IRTR Performance
+8.3%+5.1%
- GAL 0.35%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- GAL $319M
- IRTR $60M
- GAL +8.3%, better
- IRTR +5.1%
- GAL 3.25%, better
- IRTR 3.17%
- GAL 19
- IRTR 29140
- GAL 14.7K sh, better
- IRTR 12.7K sh
- GAL $52.69
- IRTR $31.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GAL | IRTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B56 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B66 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C48 | A80Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | B56 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. GAL and IRTR are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GALB
IRTRA
In short
GAL A whole portfolio in one ticker. State Street's allocation team stacks ETFs across asset classes, anchors around a 60% equity mix, and keeps at least 30% of the money in securities tied outside the US.
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
Stated mandate
GAL The fund seeks capital appreciation by investing in exchange traded funds across a diversified mix of asset classes. It generally invests at least 30% in securities tied to countries outside the U.S. and typically allocates about 60% to equities, subject to tactical decisions.
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GAL vs IRTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GAL vs IRTR Cost
Overpaying GAL vs IRTR
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GAL 0.35%
$7,126
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GAL | IRTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $147 | $487 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $575 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,689 | $5,437 |
- 0.35%GAL
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
GAL 11th cheapest of 37 funds
GAL vs IRTR Dividends
- GAL 3.25%, better
- IRTR 3.17%
- GAL $1.70
- IRTR $1.00
- GAL $0.28
- IRTR $0.08
- GAL Sep 25, 2026
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- GAL Sep 29, 2026
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- GAL Quarterly
- IRTR Monthly
Distribution history
GAL vs IRTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GAL 7.9%IRTR 7.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GAL 1.26, betterIRTR 1.14
- Worst fall
- GAL −21.1%IRTR −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GAL 0.89IRTR 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.