Skip to content
etf.net

GDT vs NTSX

WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund

GDTCCboe

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

NTSXANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

NTSX −0.08pt a year

GDT0.30%NTSX0.22%

Avg volume · 30D

NTSX 22.3×the volume

GDT1.92KNTSX42.9K

GDT vs NTSX Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−2.8%GDT+0.6%NTSX

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. GDT −2.8%. NTSX +0.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GDT 0.30%
NTSX 0.22%, better
Fund size
GDT $10M
NTSX $1.34B
1Y total return
GDT No data
NTSX +7.5%
Yield (12M)
GDT No data
NTSX 1.07%
Holdings
GDT 22
NTSX 504
Avg volume (30D)
GDT 1.92K sh
NTSX 42.9K sh, better
NAV per share
GDT $31.90
NTSX $58.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GDT: Cost 78, Risk 6, Mission not scored, Tradability 16, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. NTSX: Cost 89, Risk 64, Mission 98, Tradability 72, Holdings 72, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for GDT, NTSX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGDTNTSX
Cost30% weightA78A89Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA98
Risk15% weightF6B64Higher
Tradability15% weightF16A72Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA72
Durability5% weightD38A93Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GDT and NTSX are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Capital-Efficient Allocation⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

NTSX ranks 1st and GDT 10th of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 9CNTSEWisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core FundScore 47
  4. Rank 10CGDTWisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold FundScore 43
  5. Rank 10CUPARUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GDTCWisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund

NTSXAWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

In short

GDT No data

NTSX Stocks and Treasuries stacked on the same dollar. NTSX owns roughly 500 large U.S. companies, then layers Treasury futures on top, so one line item does the work of a balanced portfolio. Running since 2018.

Stated mandate

GDT No data

NTSX The Fund seeks total return through investments in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

Why people hold it

GDT No data

  • NTSX Costs 0.20% a year, while the typical fund in its allocation peer group charges closer to four times that.
  • The equity sleeve is a plain large-cap U.S. portfolio of roughly 500 names. The Treasury futures ride alongside as collateralized exposure, not as a stock-picking bet.wisdomtree.com
  • Delivers its stated mandate with very little drift, and rates among the strongest builds in a crowded field of allocation funds.
  • Sibling GDE runs the same capital-efficient playbook at the same 0.20% fee, swapping the Treasury leg for gold, if you want the mechanism pointed elsewhere.

Worth knowing

GDT No data

  • NTSX Futures mean total market exposure runs above the fund's actual assets. When stocks and Treasuries fall together, the drop lands harder than in an unlevered balanced fund.
  • Trades thinly for a multi-billion-dollar fund. Limit orders and quieter parts of the session matter more here than with the mega-cap index crowd.
  • Income is a side effect of the structure, not the goal. Distributions come quarterly.

Full GDT profile⁠

Full NTSX profile⁠

GDT vs NTSX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GDT vs NTSX Cost

Overpaying GDT vs NTSX

$1,591

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GDT 0.30%

    $6,149

  • NTSX 0.22%

    $4,558

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GDT 0.30%
  • NTSX 0.22%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GDT $6,149NTSX $4,558

Year by year

YearGDTNTSXOverpaying
10$545$401$144
20$2,113$1,561$552
30$6,149$4,558$1,591

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GDT
  • 0.22%NTSX, cheaper
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

NTSX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

GDT 5th cheapest of 19 funds

GDT vs NTSX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GDT No data
NTSX 1.07%
Payout (12M)
GDT No data
NTSX $0.63
Last payment
GDT $0.14
NTSX $0.16
Ex-dividend
GDT Oct 27, 2026
NTSX Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
GDT Oct 29, 2026
NTSX Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
GDT Monthly
NTSX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GDTMonthly · 7 paymentsAll GDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.04; Apr 27, 2026 $0.24; May 26, 2026 $0.39; Jun 25, 2026 $0.27; Jul 28, 2026 $0.25; Sep 25, 2026 $0.03; Oct 27, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
NTSXQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll NTSX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 26, 2023 $0.11; Sep 25, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 22, 2024 $0.11; Jun 25, 2024 $0.13; Sep 25, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.16; Sep 25, 2025 $0.17; Dec 26, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.15; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 25, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GDT vs NTSX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GDT No dataNTSX 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GDT No dataNTSX 1.28
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GDT No dataNTSX −31.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GDT 0.37NTSX 1.04

Popular comparisons

  • GDTCvsCTAPA

    WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NTSXAvsCTAPA

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GDTCvsGDEB

    WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NTSXAvsGDEB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GDTCvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NTSXAvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.