Skip to content

CTAP vs NTSX

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTAPANYSE Arca

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

NTSXANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAP −0.09pt a year

CTAP0.13%NTSX0.22%

Avg volume · 30D

CTAP 2.0×the volume

CTAP86.8KNTSX42.9K

CTAP vs NTSX Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+21.5%CTAP+8.2%NTSX

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAP +21.5%. NTSX +8.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTAP 0.13%, better
NTSX 0.22%
Fund size
CTAP $167M
NTSX $1.34B
1Y total return
CTAP No data
NTSX +7.8%
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
NTSX 1.07%
Holdings
CTAP 42
NTSX 504
Avg volume (30D)
CTAP 86.8K sh, better
NTSX 42.9K sh
NAV per share
CTAP $30.26
NTSX $58.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAP: Cost 100, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 42, Durability 59. NTSX: Cost 89, Risk 62, Mission 98, Tradability 71, Holdings 72, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAP, NTSX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAPNTSX
Cost30% weightA100HigherA89
Mission25% weightNot scoredA98
Risk15% weightC45B62Higher
Tradability15% weightB67A71Higher
Holdings10% weightC42A72Higher
Durability5% weightB59A93Higher

Rank among Capital-Efficient Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAP and NTSX are both graded against the same 19 Capital-Efficient Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 19 ›

NTSX ranks 1st and CTAP 2nd of 19 funds in the Capital-Efficient Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1ANTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core FundScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACTAPSimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3BGDEWisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy FundScore 69

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAPASimplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

NTSXAWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund

In short

CTAP Most capital-efficient funds stack bonds or gold on top of stocks. This one stacks a systematic long/short managed futures program: 100% equities plus 100% trend following in a single share, at 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026.

NTSX Stocks and Treasuries stacked on the same dollar. NTSX owns roughly 500 large U.S. companies, then layers Treasury futures on top, so one line item does the work of a balanced portfolio. Running since 2018.

Stated mandate

CTAP The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through two actively managed strategies: US large-cap equities and managed futures.

NTSX The Fund seeks total return through investments in large-capitalization U.S. equity securities and U.S. Treasury futures contracts.

Why people hold it

  • CTAP Cheapest fee in its capital-efficient peer group: 0.10% net of a waiver through December 4, 2026 (0.28% gross), versus 0.20% for NTSX and 0.20% for GDE, neither of which is waived.
  • One share carries 100% large-cap US equity exposure plus 100% managed futures exposure, so the diversifier rides on top of the stock sleeve instead of replacing it.simplify.us
  • The trend engine isn't homemade. It's a swap on Simplify's CTA ETF, a long/short futures program designed by Altis Partners, a firm with 20 years in the category.businesswire.com
  • A below-median fee and a clean two-sleeve build put it among the stronger implementations in the capital-efficient multi-asset group.
  • NTSX Costs 0.20% a year, while the typical fund in its allocation peer group charges closer to four times that.
  • The equity sleeve is a plain large-cap U.S. portfolio of roughly 500 names. The Treasury futures ride alongside as collateralized exposure, not as a stock-picking bet.wisdomtree.com
  • Delivers its stated mandate with very little drift, and rates among the strongest builds in a crowded field of allocation funds.
  • Sibling GDE runs the same capital-efficient playbook at the same 0.20% fee, swapping the Treasury leg for gold, if you want the mechanism pointed elsewhere.

Worth knowing

  • CTAP Stacking is leverage. Exposure runs to roughly twice assets via a total return swap, which magnifies losses if a sleeve falls and leaves the fund reliant on the counterparty paying.simplify.us
  • The futures sleeve is built for low correlation with stocks, not a timed hedge, so it can move against the equity leg in either direction.simplify.usbusinesswire.com
  • Launched in December 2025, so the operating history is short, and the prospectus classifies the fund as non-diversified.simplify.us
  • NTSX Futures mean total market exposure runs above the fund's actual assets. When stocks and Treasuries fall together, the drop lands harder than in an unlevered balanced fund.
  • Trades thinly for a multi-billion-dollar fund. Limit orders and quieter parts of the session matter more here than with the mega-cap index crowd.
  • Income is a side effect of the structure, not the goal. Distributions come quarterly.

Full CTAP profile⁠

Full NTSX profile⁠

CTAP vs NTSX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAP vs NTSX Cost

Overpaying NTSX vs CTAP

$1,832

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAP 0.13%

    $2,726

  • NTSX 0.22%

    $4,558

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAP 0.13%
  • NTSX 0.22%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K$5K051015202530NTSX $4,558CTAP $2,726

Year by year

YearCTAPNTSXOverpaying
10$238$401$163
20$930$1,561$631
30$2,726$4,558$1,832

Expense ratio

  • 0.13%CTAP, cheaper
  • 0.22%NTSX
  • Middle half of Capital-Efficient Allocation funds
  • Median 0.67%

CTAP cheapest of 19 funds

NTSX 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

CTAP vs NTSX Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTAP No data
NTSX 1.07%
Payout (12M)
CTAP No data
NTSX $0.63
Last payment
CTAP $0.30
NTSX $0.16
Ex-dividend
CTAP Sep 25, 2026
NTSX Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
CTAP Sep 30, 2026
NTSX Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
CTAP Quarterly
NTSX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAPQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll CTAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 26, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.30; Sep 25, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD
NTSXQuarterly · 34 paymentsAll NTSX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2018 $0.06; Dec 24, 2018 $0.08; Mar 26, 2019 $0.09; Jun 24, 2019 $0.10; Sep 24, 2019 $0.04; Dec 9, 2019 $0.11; Dec 23, 2019 $0.12; Mar 24, 2020 $0.04; Jun 23, 2020 $0.08; Sep 22, 2020 $0.09; Dec 21, 2020 $0.12; Mar 25, 2021 $0.09; Jun 24, 2021 $0.09; Sep 24, 2021 $0.09; Dec 27, 2021 $0.10; Mar 25, 2022 $0.09; Jun 24, 2022 $0.12; Sep 26, 2022 $0.12; Dec 23, 2022 $0.12; Mar 27, 2023 $0.10; Jun 26, 2023 $0.11; Sep 25, 2023 $0.13; Dec 22, 2023 $0.14; Mar 22, 2024 $0.11; Jun 25, 2024 $0.13; Sep 25, 2024 $0.13; Dec 26, 2024 $0.17; Mar 26, 2025 $0.13; Jun 25, 2025 $0.16; Sep 25, 2025 $0.17; Dec 26, 2025 $0.17; Mar 26, 2026 $0.15; Jun 25, 2026 $0.16; Sep 25, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

CTAP vs NTSX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAP No dataNTSX 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAP No dataNTSX 1.28
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAP No dataNTSX −31.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAP 1.34NTSX 1.04

CTAP and NTSX in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTAPAvsGDEB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsGDEB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsNTSIB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsNTSIB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAPAvsALLWB

    Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF · State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.13% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NTSXAvsALLWB

    WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.