SGDM ranks 2nd and GDXJ 8th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDXJ vs SGDM
SGDM −0.06pt a year
0.52%0.46%
GDXJ 123.1×the volume
4.44M36.1K
SGDM +1.8pt
+10.5%+12.3%
GDXJ vs SGDM Performance
+137.4%+156.6%
- GDXJ 0.52%
- SGDM 0.46%, better
- GDXJ $7.08B
- SGDM $568M
- GDXJ +3.6%
- SGDM +12.4%, better
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- SGDM 1.12%
- GDXJ 157
- SGDM 49
- GDXJ 4.44M sh, better
- SGDM 36.1K sh
- GDXJ $95.57
- SGDM $64.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDXJ | SGDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | B68Higher |
| Mission | A70 | A78Higher |
| Risk | D37 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | A85Higher | A70 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B60 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDXJ and SGDM are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXJB
SGDMB
In short
GDXJ The junior tier of the gold trade. GDXJ tracks an index of small-cap gold and silver miners, about 120 names worldwide, and has done so since 2009. It owns the up-and-comers rather than the household-name majors.
SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.
Stated mandate
GDXJ GDXJ seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, which represents small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and/or silver mining.
SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDXJ vs SGDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDXJ vs SGDM Cost
Overpaying GDXJ vs SGDM
$1,121
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDXJ 0.52%
$10,351
SGDM 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDXJ | SGDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $830 | $105 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $3,195 | $398 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $9,230 | $1,121 |
- 0.52%GDXJ
- 0.46%SGDM, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds
GDXJ 10th cheapest of 18 funds
GDXJ vs SGDM Dividends
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- SGDM 1.12%
- GDXJ $2.65
- SGDM $0.73
- GDXJ $2.65
- SGDM $0.73
- GDXJ Dec 22, 2025
- SGDM Dec 18, 2025
- GDXJ Dec 26, 2025
- SGDM Dec 22, 2025
- GDXJ Annual
- SGDM Annual
Distribution history
GDXJ vs SGDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GDXJ
- SGDM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDXJ 45.7%SGDM 40.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDXJ 0.93SGDM 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- GDXJ −48.8%SGDM −45.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GDXJ 0.88SGDM 0.71
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



