Skip to content

GDXJ vs RING

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF

GDXJBNYSE Arca

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

RINGBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

RING −0.13pt a year

GDXJ0.52%RING0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

GDXJ 6.8×the volume

GDXJ4.44MRING649K

10Y return · a year

RING +3.6pt

GDXJ+10.5%RING+14.1%

GDXJ vs RING Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+137.4%GDXJ+179.8%RING

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GDXJ +137.4%. RING +179.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%300%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GDXJ 0.52%
RING 0.39%, better
Fund size
GDXJ $7.08B
RING $2.06B
1Y total return
GDXJ +3.6%
RING +10.3%, better
Yield (12M)
GDXJ 2.79%, better
RING 1.35%
Holdings
GDXJ 157
RING 49
Avg volume (30D)
GDXJ 4.44M sh, better
RING 649K sh
NAV per share
GDXJ $95.57
RING $67.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GDXJ: Cost 50, Risk 37, Mission 70, Tradability 71, Holdings 85, Durability 85. RING: Cost 79, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 22, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for GDXJ, RING, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGDXJRING
Cost30% weightC50A79Higher
Mission25% weightA70Not scored
Risk15% weightD37B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA71A72Higher
Holdings10% weightA85HigherF22
Durability5% weightA85HigherA81

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GDXJ and RING are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

RING ranks 1st and GDXJ 8th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 7BAUAUGlobal X Gold Miners ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 8BGDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 9BSGDJSprott Junior Gold Miners ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GDXJBVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF

RINGBiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

In short

GDXJ The junior tier of the gold trade. GDXJ tracks an index of small-cap gold and silver miners, about 120 names worldwide, and has done so since 2009. It owns the up-and-comers rather than the household-name majors.

RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.

Stated mandate

GDXJ GDXJ seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, which represents small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and/or silver mining.

RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.

Why people hold it

  • GDXJ Small by design: the index covers companies primarily engaged in gold and/or silver mining at the small-capitalization end, roughly 120 of them across global markets.
  • Silver rides along. The mandate covers gold and/or silver miners, so the basket is broader precious metals than the name suggests.
  • One of the busiest tickets in the junior-miner niche: a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades very actively, which matters when the whole sector moves at once.
  • 0.52% a year sits right at the median for precious-metals miner funds, and roughly the same sticker as VanEck's large-cap sibling GDX at 0.51%.
  • RING At 0.39% a year it charges less than the typical gold-miner fund, and less than VanEck's GDX and GDXJ, the category's best-known names.ishares.com
  • Pure play by design: the index targets companies primarily in the business of gold mining, so you get miners rather than a mixed metals-and-materials basket.ishares.com
  • The mandate is global, not US-only, so the portfolio can reach gold producers listed across developed and emerging markets.ishares.com
  • Live since 2012, a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest builds in its precious-metals miner peer group.

Worth knowing

  • GDXJ Junior miners are the jumpy end of a jumpy sector: smaller companies, fewer mines, and moves that can run far wider than the metal itself.
  • Income is not the story here. Distributions land once or twice a year at most.
  • Average price, not a bargain. Cheaper miner funds exist in the group, including RING at 0.39%.
  • RING Roughly 40 stocks in a single industry. The largest miners carry real weight, so one company's bad quarter is felt across the fund.ishares.com
  • This is mining equity, not bullion. Alongside the gold price you take on company execution, mine geology, labor and country risk.ishares.com
  • Income is an afterthought here: distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full GDXJ profile⁠

Full RING profile⁠

GDXJ vs RING Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GDXJ vs RING Cost

Overpaying GDXJ vs RING

$2,453

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GDXJ 0.52%

    $10,351

  • RING 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GDXJ 0.52%
  • RING 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530GDXJ $10,351RING $7,898

Year by year

YearGDXJRINGOverpaying
10$935$705$230
20$3,593$2,725$868
30$10,351$7,898$2,453

Expense ratio

  • 0.52%GDXJ
  • 0.39%RING, cheaper
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds

GDXJ 10th cheapest of 18 funds

GDXJ vs RING Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GDXJ 2.79%, better
RING 1.35%
Payout (12M)
GDXJ $2.65
RING $0.90
Last payment
GDXJ $2.65
RING $0.53
Ex-dividend
GDXJ Dec 22, 2025
RING Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
GDXJ Dec 26, 2025
RING Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
GDXJ Annual
RING Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GDXJAnnual · 9 paymentsAll GDXJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.01; Dec 20, 2018 $0.14; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.86; Dec 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 19, 2022 $0.18; Dec 18, 2023 $0.27; Dec 23, 2024 $1.11; Dec 22, 2025 $2.65. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
RINGTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll RING payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.03; Dec 19, 2017 $0.05; Jun 19, 2018 $0.07; Dec 18, 2018 $0.04; Jun 17, 2019 $0.14; Dec 16, 2019 $0.05; Jun 15, 2020 $0.10; Dec 14, 2020 $0.14; Jun 10, 2021 $0.31; Dec 13, 2021 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.23; Dec 13, 2022 $0.28; Jun 7, 2023 $0.21; Dec 20, 2023 $0.28; Jun 11, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Jun 16, 2025 $0.24; Dec 16, 2025 $0.38; Jun 15, 2026 $0.53. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

GDXJ vs RING Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GDXJ
  • RING
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: RING −47.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GDXJ 45.7%RING 42.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GDXJ 0.93RING 1.01, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GDXJ −48.8%RING −47.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GDXJ 0.88RING 0.94

GDXJ and RING in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GDXJBvsSGDMB

    VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsSGDMB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDXJBvsGDXB

    VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsGDXB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GDXJBvsSLVPB

    VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.52% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsSLVPB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.