RING ranks 1st and GDXJ 8th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDXJ vs RING
RING −0.13pt a year
0.52%0.39%
GDXJ 6.8×the volume
4.44M649K
RING +3.6pt
+10.5%+14.1%
GDXJ vs RING Performance
+137.4%+179.8%
- GDXJ 0.52%
- RING 0.39%, better
- GDXJ $7.08B
- RING $2.06B
- GDXJ +3.6%
- RING +10.3%, better
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- RING 1.35%
- GDXJ 157
- RING 49
- GDXJ 4.44M sh, better
- RING 649K sh
- GDXJ $95.57
- RING $67.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDXJ | RING |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | D37 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A71 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A85Higher | F22 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A81 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDXJ and RING are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXJB
RINGB
In short
GDXJ The junior tier of the gold trade. GDXJ tracks an index of small-cap gold and silver miners, about 120 names worldwide, and has done so since 2009. It owns the up-and-comers rather than the household-name majors.
RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
Stated mandate
GDXJ GDXJ seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, which represents small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and/or silver mining.
RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDXJ vs RING Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDXJ vs RING Cost
Overpaying GDXJ vs RING
$2,453
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDXJ 0.52%
$10,351
RING 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDXJ | RING | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $705 | $230 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $2,725 | $868 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $7,898 | $2,453 |
- 0.52%GDXJ
- 0.39%RING, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds
GDXJ 10th cheapest of 18 funds
GDXJ vs RING Dividends
- GDXJ 2.79%, better
- RING 1.35%
- GDXJ $2.65
- RING $0.90
- GDXJ $2.65
- RING $0.53
- GDXJ Dec 22, 2025
- RING Jun 15, 2026
- GDXJ Dec 26, 2025
- RING Jun 18, 2026
- GDXJ Annual
- RING Twice a year
Distribution history
GDXJ vs RING Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GDXJ
- RING
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDXJ 45.7%RING 42.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GDXJ 0.93RING 1.01, better
- Worst fall
- GDXJ −48.8%RING −47.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GDXJ 0.88RING 0.94
GDXJ and RING in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



