XLK ranks 1st and GGTL 23rd of 23 funds in the Technology (Broad) Category.
GGTL vs XLK
XLK −0.82pt a year
0.90%0.08%
XLK 3930.6×the volume
2.11K8.28M
XLK +9.5pt
+18.3%+27.8%
GGTL vs XLK Performance
+10.4%+16.5%
- GGTL 0.90%
- XLK 0.08%, better
- GGTL $15M
- XLK $125B
- GGTL +10.4%
- XLK +16.5%, better
- GGTL 0.92%, better
- XLK 0.48%
- GGTL 75
- XLK 78
- GGTL 2.11K sh
- XLK 8.28M sh, better
- GGTL $35.99
- XLK $188.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GGTL | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | B57 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | F6 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | C41 | |
| Durability | F10 | A82Higher |
Rank among Technology (Broad) funds
Same Category. GGTL and XLK are both graded against the same 23 Technology (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GGTLF
XLKA
In short
GGTL Gabelli's stock-picking answer to the tech index giants: an actively run, go-anywhere portfolio aiming at capital appreciation with a robotics and automation tilt. Small, hands-on, and priced like the boutique it is at 0.90%.
XLK A 1998 original: XLK owns the technology slice of the S&P 500, about 70 names, for eight basis points. Big, heavily traded, and top-heavy by design, with quarterly caps the only brake on the giants at the top.
Stated mandate
GGTL The fund's objective is to achieve capital appreciation.
XLK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Technology Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GGTL vs XLK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GGTL vs XLK Cost
Overpaying GGTL vs XLK
$15,351
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GGTL 0.90%
$17,040
XLK 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GGTL | XLK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $147 | $1,446 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $575 | $5,440 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $1,689 | $15,351 |
- 0.90%GGTL
- 0.08%XLK, cheaper
- Middle half of Technology (Broad) funds
- Median 0.45%
XLK cheapest of 23 funds
GGTL 22nd cheapest of 23 funds
GGTL vs XLK Dividends
- GGTL 0.92%, better
- XLK 0.48%
- GGTL $0.33
- XLK $0.83
- GGTL $0.33
- XLK $0.22
- GGTL Dec 29, 2025
- XLK Sep 21, 2026
- GGTL Jan 9, 2026
- XLK Sep 23, 2026
- GGTL Annual
- XLK Quarterly
Distribution history
GGTL vs XLK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GGTL 20.3%, betterXLK 23.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GGTL 0.77XLK 1.07, better
- Worst fall
- GGTL −23.7%XLK −33.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GGTL 0.86XLK 1.36
GGTL and XLK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





