TRFM ranks 3rd and GINN 5th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
GINN vs TRFM
TRFM −0.01pt a year
0.50%0.49%
TRFM 5.6×the volume
7.17K40.1K
GINN vs TRFM Performance
+6.2%+5.8%
- GINN 0.50%
- TRFM 0.49%, better
- GINN $178M
- TRFM $313M
- GINN +6.2%, better
- TRFM +5.8%
- GINN 1.16%
- TRFM
- GINN 478
- TRFM 266
- GINN 7.17K sh
- TRFM 40.1K sh, better
- GINN $81.12
- TRFM $53.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GINN | TRFM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A81 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A83Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | D35 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B61Higher | C50 |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. GINN and TRFM are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GINNA
TRFMA
In short
GINN Five Goldman thematic ETFs walked in; one walked out. GINN bundles data, finance, health, manufacturing and consumer innovation into a single equal-weighted global basket of roughly 500 stocks, all for 0.50% a year.
TRFM Most disruption funds buy the story. TRFM screens for companies actually writing R&D checks, then spreads the theme across a couple hundred US-listed names instead of a concentrated bet on thirty.
Stated mandate
GINN The Fund seeks to track the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, gaining exposure to companies that may benefit from technological innovation across five themes shaping the economy.
TRFM The Fund passively tracks the total return of the Pence Transformers Index before fees and expenses. The index targets U.S.-listed equity securities of companies positioned to benefit from significant changes in consumer behavior and technological innovation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GINN vs TRFM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GINN vs TRFM Cost
Overpaying GINN vs TRFM
$187
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GINN 0.50%
$9,979
TRFM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GINN | TRFM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $883 | $17 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,394 | $66 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,792 | $187 |
- 0.50%GINN
- 0.49%TRFM, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
TRFM 4th cheapest of 30 funds
GINN 6th cheapest of 30 funds
GINN vs TRFM Dividends
- GINN 1.16%
- TRFM
- GINN $0.92
- TRFM
- GINN $0.92
- TRFM $0.08
- GINN Dec 23, 2025
- TRFM Dec 31, 2025
- GINN Dec 30, 2025
- TRFM Jan 5, 2026
- GINN Annual
- TRFM Irregular
Distribution history
GINN vs TRFM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GINN 15.1%, betterTRFM 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GINN 1.16, betterTRFM 1.02
- Worst fall
- GINN −41.3%TRFM −28.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GINN 1.16TRFM 1.64
GINN and TRFM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
