XITK ranks 4th and GINN 5th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
GINN vs XITK
XITK −0.05pt a year
0.50%0.45%
GINN 3.3×the volume
7.17K2.15K
GINN +9.4pt
+5.6%−3.8%
GINN vs XITK Performance
+31.2%−17.4%
- GINN 0.50%
- XITK 0.45%, better
- GINN $178M
- XITK $67M
- GINN +6.2%, better
- XITK +0.6%
- GINN 1.16%, better
- XITK 0.00%
- GINN 478
- XITK 95
- GINN 7.17K sh, better
- XITK 2.15K sh
- GINN $81.12
- XITK $197.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GINN | XITK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A95Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A83Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | D35 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A81 |
| Durability | B61 | A73Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. GINN and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GINNA
XITKA
In short
GINN Five Goldman thematic ETFs walked in; one walked out. GINN bundles data, finance, health, manufacturing and consumer innovation into a single equal-weighted global basket of roughly 500 stocks, all for 0.50% a year.
XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.
Stated mandate
GINN The Fund seeks to track the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, gaining exposure to companies that may benefit from technological innovation across five themes shaping the economy.
XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GINN vs XITK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GINN vs XITK Cost
Overpaying GINN vs XITK
$938
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GINN 0.50%
$9,979
XITK 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GINN | XITK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $812 | $88 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,128 | $332 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,041 | $938 |
- 0.50%GINN
- 0.45%XITK, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
GINN 6th cheapest of 30 funds
GINN vs XITK Dividends
- GINN 1.16%, better
- XITK 0.00%
- GINN $0.92
- XITK None
- GINN $0.92
- XITK
- GINN Dec 23, 2025
- XITK
- GINN Dec 30, 2025
- XITK
- GINN Annual
- XITK
Distribution history
GINN vs XITK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GINN
- XITK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GINN 15.1%, betterXITK 25.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- GINN 1.16, betterXITK 0.63
- Worst fall
- GINN −41.3%, betterXITK −61.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GINN 1.16XITK 1.67
GINN and XITK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
