Skip to content

GLTR vs PPLT

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

GLTRBNYSE Arca

abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF

PPLTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

GLTR0.60%PPLT0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PPLT 37.7×the volume

GLTR61.1KPPLT2.3M

10Y return · a year

GLTR +6.8pt

GLTR+10.1%PPLT+3.3%

GLTR vs PPLT Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+85.0%GLTR+37.4%PPLT

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GLTR +85.0%. PPLT +37.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%150%200%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLTR 0.60%
PPLT 0.60%
Fund size
GLTR $2.32B
PPLT $1.68B
1Y total return
GLTR −3.7%, better
PPLT −9.3%
Holdings
GLTR 1
PPLT 1
Avg volume (30D)
GLTR 61.1K sh
PPLT 2.3M sh, better
NAV per share
GLTR $167.14
PPLT $12.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLTR: Cost 41, Risk 62, Mission 92, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. PPLT: Cost 41, Risk 44, Mission 95, Tradability 54, Holdings not scored, Durability 65.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLTR, PPLT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLTRPPLT
Cost30% weightC41C41
Mission25% weightA92A95Higher
Risk15% weightB62HigherC44
Tradability15% weightB57HigherC54
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherB65

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GLTR and PPLT are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

GLTR ranks 4th and PPLT 5th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 4BGLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BPPLTabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 6CPALLabrdn Physical Palladium Shares ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLTRBabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

PPLTBabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF

In short

GLTR Gold, silver, platinum and palladium in one wrapper, all held as physical bullion. GLTR is the rare one-ticker version of the entire precious-metals complex, running since 2010, and it owns the metal instead of renting exposure through futures.

PPLT Platinum in a vault, not a futures ledger. PPLT is a grantor trust that holds the physical metal and tracks its price after a 0.60% fee, and it has been doing that job since 2010.

Stated mandate

GLTR The Trust holds a physical bullion basket containing gold, silver, platinum, and palladium in specified proportions, with baskets issued against bullion deposits and bullion distributed on redemptions.

PPLT The Trust is designed to track the price of physical platinum, after deducting its expenses.

Why people hold it

  • GLTR Four metals, one ticker: the trust holds physical gold, silver, platinum and palladium in set proportions, with baskets created and redeemed in bullion rather than cash.aberdeeninvestments.com
  • Trading since 2010 and now a multi-billion-dollar trust: one of the longest-standing ways to own the full metals basket inside a brokerage account.
  • Because it holds bullion outright, its results have tracked the underlying metals basket closely, less expenses, among the tighter records in the physical-commodity group.
  • The 0.60% fee sits right at the median for physically backed commodity funds, so the four-metal convenience is not priced above the category norm.
  • PPLT Owns physical platinum inside a grantor trust instead of futures contracts, so there is no roll schedule sitting between shareholders and the metal's price.
  • Tracking is the strong suit. The trust is built to mirror physical platinum after expenses, and it stays very close to that mark.
  • A billion-dollar-plus trust that trades actively and has been open since 2010, a long-standing wrapper in a corner of the metals market with few options.

Worth knowing

  • GLTR Single-metal siblings cost less: SIVR charges 0.30% and SLV 0.50%. Bundling four metals into one line item costs a little more than buying one.
  • The proportions are set by the trust, and platinum and palladium bring industrial demand swings a gold-only holding does not. You cannot dial the mix yourself.
  • No income here. It is a grantor trust holding metal, pays no distributions, and volume is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads deserve a glance.
  • PPLT The 0.60% fee sits right at the middle of the physical-metals pack, and GraniteShares' PLTM charges 0.50% for exposure to the same metal.
  • One metal, full stop. The ride is platinum's alone, without the smoothing of a multi-metal basket like GLTR.
  • Bars in a vault throw off no cash. The trust makes no distributions, so the metal's price is the whole story.

Full GLTR profile⁠

Full PPLT profile⁠

GLTR vs PPLT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GLTR vs PPLT Cost

Same expense ratio

$11,817

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GLTR 0.60%

    $11,817

  • PPLT 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GLTR 0.60%
  • PPLT 0.60%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530GLTR $11,817PPLT $11,817

Year by year

YearGLTRPPLT
10$1,076$1,076
20$4,116$4,116
30$11,817$11,817

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%GLTR
  • 0.60%PPLT
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

GLTR 5th cheapest of 9 funds

PPLT 5th cheapest of 9 funds

GLTR vs PPLT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GLTR None
PPLT None

Distribution history

GLTRAll GLTR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PPLTAll PPLT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GLTR vs PPLT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GLTR
  • PPLT
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PPLT −48.4% · Oct 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLTR 24.1%, betterPPLT 32.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLTR 0.82, betterPPLT 0.44
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLTR −41.9%, betterPPLT −48.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GLTR 0.68PPLT 0.55

GLTR and PPLT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GLTRBvsSIVRA

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PPLTBvsSIVRA

    abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLTRBvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PPLTBvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLTRBvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PPLTBvsPLTMB

    abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF · GraniteShares Platinum Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.