Skip to content

GLTR vs PLTM

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

GLTRBNYSE Arca

GraniteShares Platinum Trust

PLTMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

PLTM −0.10pt a year

GLTR0.60%PLTM0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PLTM 2.3×the volume

GLTR61.1KPLTM138K

5Y return · a year

GLTR +6.5pt

GLTR+13.1%PLTM+6.6%

GLTR vs PLTM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+85.0%GLTR+37.8%PLTM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GLTR +85.0%. PLTM +37.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%150%200%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GLTR 0.60%
PLTM 0.50%, better
Fund size
GLTR $2.32B
PLTM $150M
1Y total return
GLTR −3.7%, better
PLTM −9.2%
Yield (12M)
GLTR No data
PLTM 0.00%
Holdings
GLTR 1
PLTM 1
Avg volume (30D)
GLTR 61.1K sh
PLTM 138K sh, better
NAV per share
GLTR $167.14
PLTM $14.20
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GLTR: Cost 41, Risk 62, Mission 92, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. PLTM: Cost 67, Risk 44, Mission 94, Tradability 42, Holdings not scored, Durability 43.
Pillar letters and Scores for GLTR, PLTM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGLTRPLTM
Cost30% weightC41B67Higher
Mission25% weightA92A94Higher
Risk15% weightB62HigherC44
Tradability15% weightB57HigherC42
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB69HigherC43

Rank among Physical Commodities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GLTR and PLTM are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Commodities⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

PLTM ranks 3rd and GLTR 4th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASIVRabrdn Physical Silver Shares ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BSLViShares Silver TrustScore 69
  3. Rank 3BPLTMGraniteShares Platinum TrustScore 65
  4. Rank 4BGLTRabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BPPLTabrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETFScore 59

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GLTRBabrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

PLTMBGraniteShares Platinum Trust

In short

GLTR Gold, silver, platinum and palladium in one wrapper, all held as physical bullion. GLTR is the rare one-ticker version of the entire precious-metals complex, running since 2010, and it owns the metal instead of renting exposure through futures.

PLTM Platinum, in a vault, sliced into shares. PLTM holds allocated bullion and charges 0.50% a year, undercutting the older platinum trust on fee, which is most of what separates two funds holding the same metal.

Stated mandate

GLTR The Trust holds a physical bullion basket containing gold, silver, platinum, and palladium in specified proportions, with baskets issued against bullion deposits and bullion distributed on redemptions.

PLTM The Trust seeks to reflect the price of platinum, less its expenses, through allocated physical platinum bullion.

Why people hold it

  • GLTR Four metals, one ticker: the trust holds physical gold, silver, platinum and palladium in set proportions, with baskets created and redeemed in bullion rather than cash.aberdeeninvestments.com
  • Trading since 2010 and now a multi-billion-dollar trust: one of the longest-standing ways to own the full metals basket inside a brokerage account.
  • Because it holds bullion outright, its results have tracked the underlying metals basket closely, less expenses, among the tighter records in the physical-commodity group.
  • The 0.60% fee sits right at the median for physically backed commodity funds, so the four-metal convenience is not priced above the category norm.
  • PLTM At 0.50% a year it is the cheaper of the two US physical platinum trusts, and it sits under the median fee for physical commodity funds.
  • Allocated bars, not futures contracts: no roll calendar, no contango math, just platinum held for the trust.graniteshares.com
  • Simple mandate kept tightly since its 2018 launch: the platinum price less expenses, and one of the closer trackers among physical metal funds.

Worth knowing

  • GLTR Single-metal siblings cost less: SIVR charges 0.30% and SLV 0.50%. Bundling four metals into one line item costs a little more than buying one.
  • The proportions are set by the trust, and platinum and palladium bring industrial demand swings a gold-only holding does not. You cannot dial the mix yourself.
  • No income here. It is a grantor trust holding metal, pays no distributions, and volume is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads deserve a glance.
  • PLTM One metal, one line of exposure. Platinum moves in its own lane and can swing hard, with nothing else inside the fund to cushion it.
  • No income here. Expenses are met out of the metal, so each share represents a slightly smaller slice of platinum as the years pass.
  • Volume is moderate rather than mega-trust deep, so spreads and limit orders matter more when you trade in size.

Full GLTR profile⁠

Full PLTM profile⁠

GLTR vs PLTM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GLTR vs PLTM Cost

Overpaying GLTR vs PLTM

$1,838

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GLTR 0.60%

    $11,817

  • PLTM 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GLTR 0.60%
  • PLTM 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530GLTR $11,817PLTM $9,979

Year by year

YearGLTRPLTMOverpaying
10$1,076$900$176
20$4,116$3,460$656
30$11,817$9,979$1,838

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%GLTR
  • 0.50%PLTM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
  • Median 0.60%

PLTM 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

GLTR 5th cheapest of 9 funds

GLTR vs PLTM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GLTR No data
PLTM 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GLTR None
PLTM None

Distribution history

Per share, 2010 to 2015, same scale for both

GLTRAll GLTR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PLTM13 paymentsAll PLTM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2010 to 2015. Jun 22, 2010 $0.08; Dec 21, 2010 $0.04; Jun 21, 2011 $0.02; Dec 21, 2011 $0.24; Sep 21, 2012 $0.04; Dec 21, 2012 $0.02; Mar 21, 2013 $0.005; Sep 20, 2013 $0.01; Dec 18, 2013 $0.19; Mar 25, 2014 $0.04; Jun 24, 2014 $0.07; Dec 23, 2014 $0.17; Jun 24, 2015 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520122015

GLTR vs PLTM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GLTR
  • PLTM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PLTM −48.4% · Oct 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GLTR 24.1%, betterPLTM 33.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GLTR 0.82, betterPLTM 0.44
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GLTR −41.9%, betterPLTM −48.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GLTR 0.68PLTM 0.55

GLTR and PLTM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GLTRBvsSIVRA

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsSIVRA

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLTRBvsSLVB

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsSLVB

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · iShares Silver Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLTRBvsPPLTB

    abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF · abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PLTMBvsPPLTB

    GraniteShares Platinum Trust · abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.