SIVR ranks 1st and GLTR 4th of 9 funds in the Physical Commodities Category.
GLTR vs SIVR
SIVR −0.30pt a year
0.60%0.30%
SIVR 24.1×the volume
61.1K1.47M
SIVR +0.3pt
+10.1%+10.4%
GLTR vs SIVR Performance
+85.0%+103.7%
- GLTR 0.60%
- SIVR 0.30%, better
- GLTR $2.32B
- SIVR $3.45B
- GLTR −3.7%
- SIVR +1.5%, better
- GLTR 1
- SIVR 1
- GLTR 61.1K sh
- SIVR 1.47M sh, better
- GLTR $167.14
- SIVR $47.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLTR | SIVR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A92Higher | A89 |
| Risk | B62Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | B57Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69 | A73Higher |
Rank among Physical Commodities funds
Same Category. GLTR and SIVR are both graded against the same 9 Physical Commodities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLTRB
SIVRA
In short
GLTR Gold, silver, platinum and palladium in one wrapper, all held as physical bullion. GLTR is the rare one-ticker version of the entire precious-metals complex, running since 2010, and it owns the metal instead of renting exposure through futures.
SIVR Silver bullion in a vault, wrapped in a ticker. SIVR has done that one job since 2009 at 0.30% a year, half the going rate for physical metal funds, and fee is most of the tracking gap here.
Stated mandate
GLTR The Trust holds a physical bullion basket containing gold, silver, platinum, and palladium in specified proportions, with baskets issued against bullion deposits and bullion distributed on redemptions.
SIVR The Trust seeks to track the price of physical silver, after deducting its expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLTR vs SIVR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLTR vs SIVR Cost
Overpaying GLTR vs SIVR
$5,668
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLTR 0.60%
$11,817
SIVR 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLTR | SIVR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $545 | $531 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,113 | $2,003 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $6,149 | $5,668 |
- 0.60%GLTR
- 0.30%SIVR, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Commodities funds
- Median 0.60%
SIVR cheapest of 9 funds
GLTR 5th cheapest of 9 funds
GLTR vs SIVR Dividends
- GLTR None
- SIVR None
Distribution history
GLTR vs SIVR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GLTR
- SIVR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLTR 24.1%, betterSIVR 37.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLTR 0.82, betterSIVR 0.75
- Worst fall
- GLTR −41.9%, betterSIVR −57.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GLTR 0.68SIVR 1.26
GLTR and SIVR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



