JUSA ranks 1st and GSGO 21st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GSGO vs JUSA
JUSA −0.27pt a year
0.45%0.18%
JUSA 8.0×the volume
12.3K98.8K
GSGO vs JUSA Performance
+4.8%+10.4%
- GSGO 0.45%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- GSGO $183M
- JUSA $745M
- GSGO
- JUSA +10.8%
- GSGO
- JUSA 0.72%
- GSGO 54
- JUSA 263
- GSGO 12.3K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- GSGO $43.54
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSGO | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B64 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GSGO and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSGOB
JUSAA
In short
GSGO A 1999-vintage Goldman stock-picking strategy that shed its mutual fund skin in late 2025 and relisted as a cheaper ETF. Concentrated bets on companies its managers judge to have durable franchises and above-average growth ahead.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
GSGO The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies that its adviser believes are positioned for above-average long-term growth.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSGO vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSGO vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying GSGO vs JUSA
$5,292
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSGO 0.45%
$9,041
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSGO | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $328 | $484 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $1,281 | $1,847 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $3,749 | $5,292 |
- 0.45%GSGO
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
GSGO 26th cheapest of 90 funds
GSGO vs JUSA Dividends
- GSGO
- JUSA 0.72%
- GSGO None
- JUSA $0.49
- GSGO
- JUSA $0.13
- GSGO
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- GSGO
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- GSGO
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
GSGO vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSGO JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSGO JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- GSGO JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GSGO 1.27JUSA 0.98
GSGO and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

