LRGC ranks 3rd and GSGO 21st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GSGO vs LRGC
LRGC −0.06pt a year
0.45%0.39%
LRGC 2.8×the volume
12.3K34.1K
GSGO vs LRGC Performance
+4.8%+9.4%
- GSGO 0.45%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- GSGO $183M
- LRGC $1.37B
- GSGO
- LRGC +9.5%
- GSGO
- LRGC 0.53%
- GSGO 54
- LRGC 72
- GSGO 12.3K sh
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- GSGO $43.54
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSGO | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | B64 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GSGO and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSGOB
LRGCA
In short
GSGO A 1999-vintage Goldman stock-picking strategy that shed its mutual fund skin in late 2025 and relisted as a cheaper ETF. Concentrated bets on companies its managers judge to have durable franchises and above-average growth ahead.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
GSGO The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies that its adviser believes are positioned for above-average long-term growth.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSGO vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSGO vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying GSGO vs LRGC
$1,143
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSGO 0.45%
$9,041
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSGO | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $705 | $107 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,725 | $403 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $7,898 | $1,143 |
- 0.45%GSGO
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
GSGO 26th cheapest of 90 funds
GSGO vs LRGC Dividends
- GSGO
- LRGC 0.53%
- GSGO None
- LRGC $0.45
- GSGO
- LRGC $0.45
- GSGO
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- GSGO
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- GSGO
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
GSGO vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSGO LRGC 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSGO LRGC 1.26
- Worst fall
- GSGO LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GSGO 1.27LRGC 1.00
GSGO and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
