Skip to content

GSGO vs LRGC

Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF

GSGOBNasdaq

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.06pt a year

GSGO0.45%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 2.8×the volume

GSGO12.3KLRGC34.1K

GSGO vs LRGC Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+4.8%GSGO+9.4%LRGC

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GSGO +4.8%. LRGC +9.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GSGO 0.45%
LRGC 0.39%, better
Fund size
GSGO $183M
LRGC $1.37B
1Y total return
GSGO No data
LRGC +9.5%
Yield (12M)
GSGO No data
LRGC 0.53%
Holdings
GSGO 54
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
GSGO 12.3K sh
LRGC 34.1K sh, better
NAV per share
GSGO $43.54
LRGC $85.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GSGO: Cost 71, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 66, Durability 75. LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 90, Mission 79, Tradability 75, Holdings 77, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for GSGO, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGSGOLRGC
Cost30% weightA71A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightB64A90Higher
Tradability15% weightD33A75Higher
Holdings10% weightB66A77Higher
Durability5% weightA75A78Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GSGO and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and GSGO 21st of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 21BFFOGFranklin Focused Growth ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 21BGSGOGoldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETFScore 61
  7. Rank 24BLRGGNomura Focused Large Growth ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GSGOBGoldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

GSGO A 1999-vintage Goldman stock-picking strategy that shed its mutual fund skin in late 2025 and relisted as a cheaper ETF. Concentrated bets on companies its managers judge to have durable franchises and above-average growth ahead.

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

GSGO The fund seeks long-term capital growth by investing in companies that its adviser believes are positioned for above-average long-term growth.

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • GSGO 0.45% for genuine active management, below the 0.54% typical of its peer group, and Goldman lowered the fee when the fund converted into an ETF.gs.com
  • The strategy dates back to 1999, so the managers were running this book long before it moved into an ETF wrapper in December 2025.gs.com
  • A stock picker's mandate, not a benchmark hug: Goldman selects on business franchise strength, long-term prospects and management quality, aiming at above-average long-term growth.gs.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded active US growth cohort on our review, with the portfolio itself and the fund's staying power its firmest ground.
  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

  • GSGO Young in ETF form, small, and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than on a mega-fund and sizeable orders deserve care.
  • Growth mandate, no income job: it has not been making payouts, so shareholder return rides entirely on share price.
  • Cheaper ways to buy the same large-cap growth job exist in the cohort, notably JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%, both enhanced-index builds.
  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full GSGO profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

GSGO vs LRGC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GSGO vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying GSGO vs LRGC

$1,143

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GSGO 0.45%

    $9,041

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GSGO 0.45%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GSGO $9,041LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearGSGOLRGCOverpaying
10$812$705$107
20$3,128$2,725$403
30$9,041$7,898$1,143

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%GSGO
  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

GSGO 26th cheapest of 90 funds

GSGO vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GSGO No data
LRGC 0.53%
Payout (12M)
GSGO None
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
GSGO No data
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
GSGO No data
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
GSGO No data
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
GSGO No data
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GSGOAll GSGO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

GSGO vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GSGO No dataLRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GSGO No dataLRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GSGO No dataLRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GSGO 1.27LRGC 1.00

GSGO and LRGC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GSGOBvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSGOBvsGUSEA

    Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSGOBvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.