Skip to content
etf.net

GTND vs JMOM

Goaltender ETF

GTNDCNYSE Arca

JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF

JMOMANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

JMOM −0.34pt a year

GTND0.46%JMOM0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

JMOM 93.5×the volume

GTND1.42KJMOM133K

GTND vs JMOM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.6%GTND−1.4%JMOM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GTND +0.6%. JMOM −1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.2%4%6%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GTND 0.46%
JMOM 0.12%, better
Fund size
GTND $55M
JMOM $2.69B
1Y total return
GTND No data
JMOM +16.7%
Yield (12M)
GTND No data
JMOM 0.78%
Holdings
GTND 6
JMOM 290
Avg volume (30D)
GTND 1.42K sh
JMOM 133K sh, better
NAV per share
GTND $24.91
JMOM $79.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GTND: Cost 79, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 33, Durability 38. JMOM: Cost 100, Risk 84, Mission 93, Tradability 63, Holdings 82, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for GTND, JMOM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGTNDJMOM
Cost30% weightA79A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightB67A84Higher
Tradability15% weightF13B63Higher
Holdings10% weightD33A82Higher
Durability5% weightD38A93Higher

Rank among US Active Momentum funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GTND and JMOM are both graded against the same 20 US Active Momentum funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Momentum⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

JMOM ranks 1st and GTND 8th of 20 funds in the US Active Momentum Category.

  1. Rank 1AJMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASEIMSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Momentum Active ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 7BSMOMSymmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 8CGTNDGoaltender ETFScore 54
  5. Rank 8CMFMOMotley Fool Momentum Factor ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GTNDCGoaltender ETF

JMOMAJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF

In short

GTND Ritholtz Wealth's first ETF puts its in-house trend-following playbook into a ticker: a monthly read on US stock and tech price trends, and when a trend breaks, that sleeve shifts half to T-bills and half to low-volatility stocks.

JMOM Momentum without the markup. JMOM screens US stocks for strong risk-adjusted momentum rather than raw price runs, and charges 0.12%, a fraction of what the typical fund in its category asks.

Stated mandate

GTND The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

JMOM The fund seeks domestic equity exposure focused on companies with strong risk-adjusted momentum and potential return enhancement.

Why people hold it

  • GTND Risk-off doesn't mean all cash. A defensive sleeve moves 50% to a short-term T-bill index and 50% to a US low-volatility index, so some equity exposure stays on.sec.gov
  • Two sleeves, judged separately: a broad US 500 index and a US technology 100 index. Tech can flip defensive while the broad market sleeve stays risk-on.etfarchitect.com
  • Built-in whipsaw guard: the sub-adviser may override a flip to risk-off when it stems from a small recent dip inside a general uptrend.etfarchitect.com
  • At 0.46%, it charges less than the typical fund in its US systematic-momentum peer group, unusual for an active strategy with a defensive switch.
  • JMOM At 0.12%, the lowest fee among its momentum peers: it undercuts VFMO and SPMO (0.13%) and MTUM (0.15%), and sits far below the roughly 0.69% category median.
  • The screen targets risk-adjusted momentum, not just the biggest price runs, so how bumpy a stock's climb was factors into whether it makes the cut.jpmorgan.com
  • Holds roughly 300 US names, a wider net than momentum sleeves that concentrate in a few dozen winners, and it pays out quarterly.
  • Live since 2017 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it rates as one of the stronger implementations in the systematic US momentum group.

Worth knowing

  • GTND The fund launched in 2026, so its live record is short. The strategy's history lives at the advisory firm, not in the ETF's own track record.
  • It trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads can be wider than on the big momentum funds.
  • Plain index momentum in this peer group costs less (JMOM 0.12%, VFMO 0.13%). The extra fee here buys the trend signal and the defensive switch.
  • JMOM Momentum by construction leans into what has already been working, which means the portfolio can be caught on the wrong side when market leadership flips.
  • The benchmark is J.P. Morgan's own US Momentum Factor Index, so methodology and rebalance rules sit with the issuer rather than an outside index provider.jpmorgan.com
  • Only moderately traded next to the category's headline tickers, so spreads are worth a look before placing size.

Full GTND profile⁠

Full JMOM profile⁠

GTND vs JMOM Holdings

How GTND and JMOM differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GTND and 0.0% of JMOM.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile98.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for GTND.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GTND and JMOM, widest gap first
CountryMore in GTNDMore in JMOM
United StatesJMOM +0.8 points
Other countries (9)GTND +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GTND100.0%
  • JMOM18.7%

Securities held

  • GTND5
  • JMOM288

Asset class

GTND
Equity
JMOM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GTND5
  • In both0
  • Only in JMOM288

Only in GTND

5 securities, 99.9% of GTND by weight

  • Invesco QQQ Trust Series 140.13%
  • iShares Core S&P 500 ETF40.06%
  • State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust19.03%

Only in JMOM

288 securities, 100% of JMOM by weight

  • Apple Inc Common Stock2.25%
  • Advanced Micro Devices2.21%
  • Microsoft Corp Common2.18%

Weight gaps

GTND and JMOM share no securities.

All GTND holdings⁠All 288 JMOM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GTND vs JMOM Cost

Overpaying GTND vs JMOM

$6,710

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GTND 0.46%

    $9,230

  • JMOM 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GTND 0.46%
  • JMOM 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GTND $9,230JMOM $2,520

Year by year

YearGTNDJMOMOverpaying
10$830$220$610
20$3,195$859$2,336
30$9,230$2,520$6,710

Expense ratio

  • 0.46%GTND
  • 0.12%JMOM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Momentum funds
  • Median 0.64%

JMOM cheapest of 20 funds

GTND 6th cheapest of 20 funds

GTND vs JMOM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GTND No data
JMOM 0.78%
Payout (12M)
GTND No data
JMOM $0.62
Last payment
GTND $0.03
JMOM $0.18
Ex-dividend
GTND Sep 28, 2026
JMOM Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
GTND Sep 30, 2026
JMOM Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
GTND Quarterly
JMOM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GTNDQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll GTND payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2026 $0.04; Sep 28, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
JMOMQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll JMOM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.08; Mar 21, 2018 $0.07; Jun 26, 2018 $0.10; Sep 25, 2018 $0.08; Dec 24, 2018 $0.08; Mar 20, 2019 $0.07; Jun 25, 2019 $0.10; Sep 24, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.12; Mar 24, 2020 $0.08; Jun 23, 2020 $0.07; Sep 22, 2020 $0.08; Dec 22, 2020 $0.11; Mar 23, 2021 $0.06; Jun 22, 2021 $0.06; Sep 21, 2021 $0.08; Dec 21, 2021 $0.11; Mar 22, 2022 $0.08; Jun 21, 2022 $0.13; Sep 20, 2022 $0.14; Dec 20, 2022 $0.18; Mar 21, 2023 $0.12; Jun 20, 2023 $0.14; Sep 19, 2023 $0.12; Dec 19, 2023 $0.18; Mar 19, 2024 $0.05; Jun 25, 2024 $0.10; Sep 24, 2024 $0.11; Dec 24, 2024 $0.18; Mar 25, 2025 $0.11; Jun 24, 2025 $0.14; Sep 23, 2025 $0.16; Dec 23, 2025 $0.17; Mar 24, 2026 $0.12; Jun 23, 2026 $0.15; Sep 22, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

GTND vs JMOM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GTND No dataJMOM 15.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GTND No dataJMOM 1.37
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GTND No dataJMOM −28.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GTND 1.31JMOM 1.07

Popular comparisons

  • GTNDCvsSEIMA

    Goaltender ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Momentum Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JMOMAvsSEIMA

    JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Momentum Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GTNDCvsVFMOA

    Goaltender ETF · Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JMOMAvsVFMOA

    JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GTNDCvsQMOMA

    Goaltender ETF · Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JMOMAvsQMOMA

    JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.28%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.