Skip to content
etf.net

GUSE vs HYP

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF

HYPDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.55pt a year

GUSE0.30%HYP0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

HYP 1.6×the volume

GUSE24.9KHYP40.2K

GUSE vs HYP Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+7.2%HYP

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. HYP +7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%30%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
HYP 0.85%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
HYP $35M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
HYP +0.3%
Holdings
GUSE 122
HYP 61
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh
HYP 40.2K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
HYP $26.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. HYP: Cost 7, Risk 25, Mission 12, Tradability 51, Holdings 90, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, HYP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSEHYP
Cost30% weightA97HigherF7
Mission25% weightNot scoredF12
Risk15% weightA94HigherD25
Tradability15% weightC46C51Higher
Holdings10% weightA89A90Higher
Durability5% weightA85HigherD33

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and HYP are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and HYP 77th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 77DGKAdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETFScore 32
  5. Rank 77DHYPGolden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETFScore 32
  6. Rank 79DARWGArcher Growth ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

HYPDGolden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

HYP An active US growth fund that launched in 2006, a decade before active ETFs became fashionable. Plain wrapper, in-house stock-picking model, and a fee well above the quant-run newcomers now crowding the same lane.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

HYP The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • HYP Launched in 2006, when active ETFs were still a curiosity. It has run a US growth book through the financial crisis, the 2010s melt-up, and the 2022 reset.
  • The portfolio is the strongest part of the package: straightforward US-listed stocks inside a standard 1940 Act fund, with no offshore or partnership plumbing to decode.
  • One job, stated plainly: capital appreciation from US stocks chosen by a proprietary growth model. No sector sleeves, no index to hug.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • HYP The 0.85% annual fee sits above what most active US growth ETFs charge, including quant-driven peers like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) fishing in the same pond.
  • Small asset base and thin trading. The price on screen can drift further from the portfolio's value than it would in a heavily traded peer, so the order type you use matters.
  • The name sets a high bar. In practice the book has read closer to mainstream US growth than the 'hypergrowth' billing implies, and it has been a volatile ride.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full HYP profile⁠

GUSE vs HYP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs HYP Cost

Overpaying HYP vs GUSE

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • HYP 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • HYP 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HYP $16,199GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSEHYPOverpaying
10$545$1,508$963
20$2,113$5,706$3,593
30$6,149$16,199$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.85%HYP
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

HYP 82nd cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs HYP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
HYP $0.03
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
HYP Dec 24, 2025
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
HYP Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
HYP Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
HYPIrregular · 1 paymentAll HYP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2025 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GUSE vs HYP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataHYP 37.3%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataHYP 0.14since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataHYP −28.8%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93HYP 1.44

GUSE and HYP in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HYPDvsJUSAA

    Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HYPDvsLRGCA

    Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HYPDvsFELGA

    Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.