LRGC ranks 3rd and HYP 77th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
HYP vs LRGC
LRGC −0.46pt a year
0.85%0.39%
HYP 1.2×the volume
40.2K34.1K
HYP vs LRGC Performance
+0.3%+9.5%
- HYP 0.85%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- HYP $35M
- LRGC $1.37B
- HYP +0.3%
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- HYP
- LRGC 0.53%
- HYP 61
- LRGC 72
- HYP 40.2K sh, better
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- HYP $26.35
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYP | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A82Higher |
| Mission | F12 | A79Higher |
| Risk | D25 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | A77 |
| Durability | D33 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. HYP and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYPD
LRGCA
In short
HYP An active US growth fund that launched in 2006, a decade before active ETFs became fashionable. Plain wrapper, in-house stock-picking model, and a fee well above the quant-run newcomers now crowding the same lane.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
HYP The Fund seeks capital appreciation.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYP vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYP vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying HYP vs LRGC
$8,301
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYP 0.85%
$16,199
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYP | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $705 | $803 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $2,725 | $2,981 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $7,898 | $8,301 |
- 0.85%HYP
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
HYP 82nd cheapest of 90 funds
HYP vs LRGC Dividends
- HYP
- LRGC 0.53%
- HYP
- LRGC $0.45
- HYP $0.03
- LRGC $0.45
- HYP Dec 24, 2025
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- HYP Dec 26, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- HYP Irregular
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
HYP vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYP 37.3%LRGC 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYP 0.14LRGC 1.26
- Worst fall
- HYP −28.8%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HYP 1.44LRGC 1.00
HYP and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

