Skip to content
etf.net

HYP vs JUSA

Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF

HYPDNasdaq

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.67pt a year

HYP0.85%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 2.5×the volume

HYP40.2KJUSA98.8K

HYP vs JUSA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.3%HYP+10.8%JUSA

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HYP +0.3%. JUSA +10.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HYP 0.85%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
HYP $35M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
HYP +0.3%
JUSA +10.8%, better
Yield (12M)
HYP No data
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
HYP 61
JUSA 263
Avg volume (30D)
HYP 40.2K sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
HYP $26.35
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HYP: Cost 7, Risk 25, Mission 12, Tradability 51, Holdings 90, Durability 33. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for HYP, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHYPJUSA
Cost30% weightF7A99Higher
Mission25% weightF12A84Higher
Risk15% weightD25A92Higher
Tradability15% weightC51B58Higher
Holdings10% weightA90HigherA84
Durability5% weightD33A76Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HYP and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and HYP 77th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 77DGKAdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETFScore 32
  4. Rank 77DHYPGolden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETFScore 32
  5. Rank 79DARWGArcher Growth ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HYPDGolden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

HYP An active US growth fund that launched in 2006, a decade before active ETFs became fashionable. Plain wrapper, in-house stock-picking model, and a fee well above the quant-run newcomers now crowding the same lane.

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

HYP The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

  • HYP Launched in 2006, when active ETFs were still a curiosity. It has run a US growth book through the financial crisis, the 2010s melt-up, and the 2022 reset.
  • The portfolio is the strongest part of the package: straightforward US-listed stocks inside a standard 1940 Act fund, with no offshore or partnership plumbing to decode.
  • One job, stated plainly: capital appreciation from US stocks chosen by a proprietary growth model. No sector sleeves, no index to hug.
  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

  • HYP The 0.85% annual fee sits above what most active US growth ETFs charge, including quant-driven peers like JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%) fishing in the same pond.
  • Small asset base and thin trading. The price on screen can drift further from the portfolio's value than it would in a heavily traded peer, so the order type you use matters.
  • The name sets a high bar. In practice the book has read closer to mainstream US growth than the 'hypergrowth' billing implies, and it has been a volatile ride.
  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full HYP profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

HYP vs JUSA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HYP vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying HYP vs JUSA

$12,450

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HYP 0.85%

    $16,199

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HYP 0.85%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530HYP $16,199JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearHYPJUSAOverpaying
10$1,508$328$1,180
20$5,706$1,281$4,425
30$16,199$3,749$12,450

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%HYP
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

HYP 82nd cheapest of 90 funds

HYP vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HYP No data
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
HYP No data
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
HYP $0.03
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
HYP Dec 24, 2025
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
HYP Dec 26, 2025
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
HYP Irregular
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

HYPIrregular · 1 paymentAll HYP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2025 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD

HYP vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HYP 37.3%since Oct 2025JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HYP 0.14since Oct 2025JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HYP −28.8%since Sep 2025JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HYP 1.44JUSA 0.98

HYP and JUSA in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • HYPDvsGUSEA

    Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HYPDvsLRGCA

    Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HYPDvsFELGA

    Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.