Skip to content

GUSE vs SEMG

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Suncoast Select Growth ETF

SEMGDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.30pt a year

GUSE0.30%SEMG0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 4.0×the volume

GUSE24.9KSEMG6.16K

GUSE vs SEMG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE−0.5%SEMG

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. SEMG −0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%, better
SEMG 0.60%
Fund size
GUSE $421M
SEMG $63M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
SEMG +0.6%
Holdings
GUSE 122
SEMG 24
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
SEMG 6.16K sh
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
SEMG $27.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. SEMG: Cost 34, Risk 46, Mission 68, Tradability 26, Holdings 34, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, SEMG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSESEMG
Cost30% weightA97HigherD34
Mission25% weightNot scoredB68
Risk15% weightA94HigherC46
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD26
Holdings10% weightA89HigherD34
Durability5% weightA85HigherD39

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and SEMG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and SEMG 75th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 74DPJFGPGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETFScore 36
  5. Rank 75DSEMGSuncoast Select Growth ETFScore 35
  6. Rank 75DTIHThe Investment House ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

SEMGDSuncoast Select Growth ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

SEMG Active conviction investing with nothing to hide behind: roughly 15 to 30 US stocks, picked bottom-up under one in-house rulebook. No index, no long tail, and every holding carries real weight.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

SEMG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of approximately 15–30 U.S.-listed companies selected using bottom-up fundamental analysis.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • SEMG Real concentration: about 15 to 30 US-listed names, so individual picks actually move the fund instead of being diluted by a 500-stock tail.
  • Stock selection runs through a named house process, the SEM Disciplined Investment System, which blends growth and value screens rather than chasing a single style.
  • Plain plumbing: a standard 1940 Act fund holding US-listed stocks. No leverage, no derivatives overlay, no exotic wrapper to decode.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • SEMG At 0.60% a year it prices above the typical fund in its active US growth cohort, and well above enhanced-index rivals such as JUSA (0.12%) and FELG (0.18%).
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so spreads and order handling deserve more attention here than with a mega-cap index product.
  • Launched in 2025, so the track record is short, and a book this concentrated means a handful of names can set the tone in any given stretch.

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full SEMG profile⁠

GUSE vs SEMG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs SEMG Cost

Overpaying SEMG vs GUSE

$5,668

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • SEMG 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • SEMG 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530SEMG $11,817GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearGUSESEMGOverpaying
10$545$1,076$531
20$2,113$4,116$2,003
30$6,149$11,817$5,668

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • 0.60%SEMG
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

SEMG 59th cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs SEMG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
SEMG $0.01
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
SEMG Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
SEMG Dec 24, 2025
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
SEMG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
SEMGIrregular · 1 paymentAll SEMG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GUSE vs SEMG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataSEMG 11.3%since Jun 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataSEMG 0.10since Jun 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataSEMG −15.8%since May 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93SEMG 0.85

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMGDvsJUSAA

    Suncoast Select Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMGDvsLRGCA

    Suncoast Select Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEMGDvsFELGA

    Suncoast Select Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.