GUSE ranks 2nd and SEMG 75th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs SEMG
GUSE −0.30pt a year
0.30%0.60%
GUSE 4.0×the volume
24.9K6.16K
GUSE vs SEMG Performance
+11.8%−0.5%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- SEMG 0.60%
- GUSE $421M
- SEMG $63M
- GUSE
- SEMG +0.6%
- GUSE 122
- SEMG 24
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- SEMG 6.16K sh
- GUSE $46.05
- SEMG $27.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | SEMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D34 |
| Mission | B68 | |
| Risk | A94Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D34 |
| Durability | A85Higher | D39 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and SEMG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
SEMGD
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
SEMG Active conviction investing with nothing to hide behind: roughly 15 to 30 US stocks, picked bottom-up under one in-house rulebook. No index, no long tail, and every holding carries real weight.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
SEMG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of approximately 15–30 U.S.-listed companies selected using bottom-up fundamental analysis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs SEMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs SEMG Cost
Overpaying SEMG vs GUSE
$5,668
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
SEMG 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | SEMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,076 | $531 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $4,116 | $2,003 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $11,817 | $5,668 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.60%SEMG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
SEMG 59th cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs SEMG Dividends
- GUSE $0.30
- SEMG $0.01
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- SEMG Dec 23, 2025
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- SEMG Dec 24, 2025
- GUSE Irregular
- SEMG Irregular
Distribution history
GUSE vs SEMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GUSE SEMG 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GUSE SEMG 0.10
- Worst fall
- GUSE SEMG −15.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.93SEMG 0.85
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.