LRGC ranks 3rd and SEMG 75th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
LRGC vs SEMG
LRGC −0.21pt a year
0.39%0.60%
LRGC 5.5×the volume
34.1K6.16K
LRGC vs SEMG Performance
+9.5%+0.6%
- LRGC 0.39%, better
- SEMG 0.60%
- LRGC $1.37B
- SEMG $63M
- LRGC +9.5%, better
- SEMG +0.6%
- LRGC 0.53%
- SEMG
- LRGC 72
- SEMG 24
- LRGC 34.1K sh, better
- SEMG 6.16K sh
- LRGC $85.00
- SEMG $27.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRGC | SEMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D34 |
| Mission | A79Higher | B68 |
| Risk | A90Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | D34 |
| Durability | A78Higher | D39 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. LRGC and SEMG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRGCA
SEMGD
In short
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
SEMG Active conviction investing with nothing to hide behind: roughly 15 to 30 US stocks, picked bottom-up under one in-house rulebook. No index, no long tail, and every holding carries real weight.
Stated mandate
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
SEMG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of approximately 15–30 U.S.-listed companies selected using bottom-up fundamental analysis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRGC vs SEMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRGC vs SEMG Cost
Overpaying SEMG vs LRGC
$3,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
SEMG 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRGC | SEMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,076 | $371 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,116 | $1,391 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $11,817 | $3,919 |
- 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
- 0.60%SEMG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
SEMG 59th cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC vs SEMG Dividends
- LRGC 0.53%
- SEMG
- LRGC $0.45
- SEMG
- LRGC $0.45
- SEMG $0.01
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- SEMG Dec 23, 2025
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- SEMG Dec 24, 2025
- LRGC Annual
- SEMG Irregular
Distribution history
LRGC vs SEMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRGC 12.7%SEMG 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- LRGC 1.26SEMG 0.10
- Worst fall
- LRGC −19.4%SEMG −15.8%
- Market sensitivity
- LRGC 1.00SEMG 0.85
LRGC and SEMG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
