JUSA ranks 1st and SEMG 75th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs SEMG
JUSA −0.42pt a year
0.18%0.60%
JUSA 16.0×the volume
98.8K6.16K
JUSA vs SEMG Performance
+10.8%+0.6%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- SEMG 0.60%
- JUSA $745M
- SEMG $63M
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- SEMG +0.6%
- JUSA 0.72%
- SEMG
- JUSA 263
- SEMG 24
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- SEMG 6.16K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- SEMG $27.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | SEMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D34 |
| Mission | A84Higher | B68 |
| Risk | A92Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | D34 |
| Durability | A76Higher | D39 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and SEMG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
SEMGD
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
SEMG Active conviction investing with nothing to hide behind: roughly 15 to 30 US stocks, picked bottom-up under one in-house rulebook. No index, no long tail, and every holding carries real weight.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
SEMG The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of approximately 15–30 U.S.-listed companies selected using bottom-up fundamental analysis.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs SEMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs SEMG Cost
Overpaying SEMG vs JUSA
$8,068
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
SEMG 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | SEMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,076 | $748 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $4,116 | $2,835 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $11,817 | $8,068 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.60%SEMG
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
SEMG 59th cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs SEMG Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%
- SEMG
- JUSA $0.49
- SEMG
- JUSA $0.13
- SEMG $0.01
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- SEMG Dec 23, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- SEMG Dec 24, 2025
- JUSA Quarterly
- SEMG Irregular
Distribution history
JUSA vs SEMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%SEMG 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41SEMG 0.10
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%SEMG −15.8%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98SEMG 0.85
JUSA and SEMG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

