GUSE ranks 2nd and TSCM 60th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
GUSE vs TSCM
GUSE −0.25pt a year
0.30%0.55%
GUSE 16.6×the volume
24.9K1.5K
GUSE vs TSCM Performance
+11.8%−5.9%
- GUSE 0.30%, better
- TSCM 0.55%
- GUSE $421M
- TSCM $43M
- GUSE 122
- TSCM 42
- GUSE 24.9K sh, better
- TSCM 1.5K sh
- GUSE $46.05
- TSCM $19.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GUSE | TSCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C47 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A94Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | C46Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | A89Higher | A85 |
| Durability | A85Higher | F17 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. GUSE and TSCM are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GUSEA
TSCMC
In short
GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.
TSCM TimesSquare has managed mid cap growth money since 2000. TSCM is the firm's first ETF, putting that bottom-up, quality-screened process into a wrapper that used to mean a separate account, a mutual fund or a collective trust.
Stated mandate
GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.
TSCM The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of equity securities of mid-capitalization companies with quality-growth attributes. It is actively managed and uses a bottom-up, research-intensive investment process.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GUSE vs TSCM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GUSE vs TSCM Cost
Overpaying TSCM vs GUSE
$4,755
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GUSE 0.30%
$6,149
TSCM 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GUSE | TSCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $988 | $443 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,790 | $1,677 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $10,904 | $4,755 |
- 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
- 0.55%TSCM
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds
TSCM 43rd cheapest of 90 funds
GUSE vs TSCM Dividends
- GUSE
- TSCM None
- GUSE $0.30
- TSCM
- GUSE Dec 23, 2025
- TSCM
- GUSE Dec 30, 2025
- TSCM
- GUSE Irregular
- TSCM
Distribution history
GUSE vs TSCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- GUSE 0.93TSCM 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.