JUSA ranks 1st and TSCM 60th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs TSCM
JUSA −0.37pt a year
0.18%0.55%
JUSA 65.9×the volume
98.8K1.5K
JUSA vs TSCM Performance
+10.4%−5.9%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- TSCM 0.55%
- JUSA $745M
- TSCM $43M
- JUSA +10.8%
- TSCM
- JUSA 0.72%
- TSCM
- JUSA 263
- TSCM 42
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- TSCM 1.5K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- TSCM $19.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | TSCM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | A92Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B58Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | A84 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | F17 |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and TSCM are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
TSCMC
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
TSCM TimesSquare has managed mid cap growth money since 2000. TSCM is the firm's first ETF, putting that bottom-up, quality-screened process into a wrapper that used to mean a separate account, a mutual fund or a collective trust.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
TSCM The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of equity securities of mid-capitalization companies with quality-growth attributes. It is actively managed and uses a bottom-up, research-intensive investment process.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs TSCM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs TSCM Cost
Overpaying TSCM vs JUSA
$7,155
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
TSCM 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | TSCM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $988 | $660 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $3,790 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $10,904 | $7,155 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.55%TSCM
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
TSCM 43rd cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs TSCM Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%
- TSCM
- JUSA $0.49
- TSCM None
- JUSA $0.13
- TSCM
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- TSCM
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- TSCM
- JUSA Quarterly
- TSCM
Distribution history
JUSA vs TSCM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%TSCM
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41TSCM
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%TSCM
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98TSCM 0.76
JUSA and TSCM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

