Skip to content
etf.net

GXDW vs KOMP

Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF

GXDWCNasdaq

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

KOMPANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

KOMP −0.30pt a year

GXDW0.50%KOMP0.20%

Avg volume · 30D

KOMP 23.8×the volume

GXDW2.94KKOMP70K

5Y return · a year

KOMP +13.8pt

GXDW−13.2%KOMP+0.6%

GXDW vs KOMP Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−50.7%GXDW+3.2%KOMP

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GXDW −50.7%. KOMP +3.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GXDW 0.50%
KOMP 0.20%, better
Fund size
GXDW $6M
KOMP $2.57B
1Y total return
GXDW −14.8%
KOMP −1.6%, better
Yield (12M)
GXDW 1.53%
KOMP 1.63%, better
Holdings
GXDW 6
KOMP 501
Avg volume (30D)
GXDW 2.94K sh
KOMP 70K sh, better
NAV per share
GXDW $23.47
KOMP $64.63
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GXDW: Cost 81, Risk 21, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 28, Durability 37. KOMP: Cost 100, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 88, Durability 88.
Pillar letters and Scores for GXDW, KOMP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGXDWKOMP
Cost30% weightA81A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF21B55Higher
Tradability15% weightD29A77Higher
Holdings10% weightD28A88Higher
Durability5% weightD37A88Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GXDW and KOMP are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

KOMP ranks 2nd and GXDW 15th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 14CNBDSNeuberger Berman Disrupters ETFScore 50
  5. Rank 15CGXDWGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 16CILDRFirst Trust Innovation Leaders ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GXDWCGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF

KOMPAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

In short

GXDW Momentum traffic control for Global X's own theme lineup. Since its 2025 rebuild, GXDW holds the five Global X thematic ETFs showing the strongest relative strength, and it can reshuffle them monthly as leadership changes.

KOMP Most thematic funds bet on one idea. KOMP buys the whole Fourth Industrial Revolution: 20-plus Kensho subsectors, from robotics to genetic engineering, spread across roughly 500 global stocks for 0.20% a year.

Stated mandate

GXDW The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index.

KOMP The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index.

Why people hold it

  • GXDW Rules, not hunches: the index ranks Global X's thematic ETFs on relative price strength, holds the top five at equal weight, and can reconstitute monthly.globalxetfs.comnasdaq.comglobalxetfs.com 2
  • One ticker covers five themes at once, so you are not maintaining a shelf of single-theme funds or deciding by hand when to swap one out.globalxetfs.com
  • The 0.50% expense ratio runs below the median fee in its disruptive-innovation peer group, and that covers the rotation work too.
  • Selection keys off price behavior rather than earnings forecasts, which makes the process easy to audit: strongest recent trend in, laggards out.globalxetfs.com
  • KOMP 0.20% a year, under a third of the typical disruptive-innovation fund's fee and below peers like XT (0.46%) and TRFM (0.49%).
  • Kensho's language-processing engine scans regulatory filings for context and keywords, so membership rests on what a company discloses it does, not an old sector label.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • About 500 global names across 20-plus subsectors, equal weighted within each group with extra weight to 'core' operators. One mega-cap can't run the show.spglobal.com
  • Trading since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it sits among the strongest implementations in the disruptive-innovation group.

Worth knowing

  • GXDW The menu is in-house. The index ranks only Global X's own thematic ETFs, so a leading theme run by another issuer cannot be picked up.globalxetfs.comnasdaq.com
  • Momentum follows price, so themes get added after a run and dropped after they stall. Choppy, trendless markets are the hard case for this design.globalxetfs.com
  • It stays a small, lightly traded fund, so spreads can be wider than the category's household names, and cheaper broad innovation options exist (KOMP charges 0.20%).
  • KOMP Equal weighting reaches down into smaller, earlier-stage innovators, so swings run wider than a plain broad-market index fund.spglobal.com
  • Subsector weights follow a risk-adjusted-return formula with annual reconstitution, so the mix drifts toward industries that have recently performed well.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • Breadth cuts both ways: a pure play on one theme like AI or space gets diluted here across the entire innovation map.spglobal.com

Full GXDW profile⁠

Full KOMP profile⁠

GXDW vs KOMP Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GXDW vs KOMP Cost

Overpaying GXDW vs KOMP

$5,824

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GXDW 0.50%

    $9,979

  • KOMP 0.20%

    $4,155

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GXDW 0.50%
  • KOMP 0.20%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GXDW $9,979KOMP $4,155

Year by year

YearGXDWKOMPOverpaying
10$900$365$535
20$3,460$1,421$2,039
30$9,979$4,155$5,824

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GXDW
  • 0.20%KOMP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

KOMP cheapest of 30 funds

GXDW 6th cheapest of 30 funds

GXDW vs KOMP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GXDW 1.53%
KOMP 1.63%, better
Payout (12M)
GXDW $0.36
KOMP $1.02
Last payment
GXDW $0.08
KOMP $0.13
Ex-dividend
GXDW Jun 29, 2026
KOMP Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
GXDW Jul 7, 2026
KOMP Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
GXDW Twice a year
KOMP Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

GXDWTwice a year · 14 paymentsAll GXDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2019 $0.08; Jun 29, 2020 $0.02; Dec 30, 2020 $0.19; Jun 29, 2021 $0.11; Dec 30, 2021 $0.59; Jun 29, 2022 $0.04; Dec 29, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2023 $0.11; Dec 28, 2023 $0.38; Jun 27, 2024 $0.13; Dec 30, 2024 $0.13; Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Dec 30, 2025 $0.28; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
KOMPQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll KOMP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2018 $0.04; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.03; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.11; Dec 30, 2019 $0.05; Mar 23, 2020 $0.06; Jun 22, 2020 $0.06; Sep 21, 2020 $0.07; Dec 21, 2020 $0.20; Mar 22, 2021 $0.22; Jun 21, 2021 $0.14; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.36; Mar 21, 2022 $0.08; Jun 21, 2022 $0.17; Sep 19, 2022 $0.17; Dec 19, 2022 $0.15; Mar 20, 2023 $0.10; Jun 20, 2023 $0.15; Sep 18, 2023 $0.12; Dec 18, 2023 $0.22; Mar 18, 2024 $0.08; Jun 24, 2024 $0.16; Sep 23, 2024 $0.10; Dec 23, 2024 $0.19; Mar 24, 2025 $0.12; Jun 23, 2025 $0.12; Sep 22, 2025 $0.14; Dec 22, 2025 $0.72; Mar 23, 2026 $0.07; Jun 22, 2026 $0.10; Sep 21, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

GXDW vs KOMP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GXDW
  • KOMP
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GXDW −60.4% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GXDW 25.1%KOMP 22.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GXDW 0.14KOMP 0.76, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GXDW −60.4%KOMP −45.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GXDW 1.72KOMP 1.65

GXDW and KOMP in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • GXDWCvsXTA

    Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KOMPAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GXDWCvsTRFMA

    Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KOMPAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GXDWCvsXITKA

    Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KOMPAvsXITKA

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF · State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.