Skip to content
etf.net

GXDW vs XITK

Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF

GXDWCNasdaq

State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITKANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XITK −0.05pt a year

GXDW0.50%XITK0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

GXDW 1.4×the volume

GXDW2.94KXITK2.15K

5Y return · a year

XITK +9.4pt

GXDW−13.2%XITK−3.8%

GXDW vs XITK Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−50.7%GXDW−17.4%XITK

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GXDW −50.7%. XITK −17.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−30%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GXDW 0.50%
XITK 0.45%, better
Fund size
GXDW $6M
XITK $67M
1Y total return
GXDW −14.8%
XITK +0.6%, better
Yield (12M)
GXDW 1.53%, better
XITK 0.00%
Holdings
GXDW 6
XITK 95
Avg volume (30D)
GXDW 2.94K sh, better
XITK 2.15K sh
NAV per share
GXDW $23.47
XITK $197.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GXDW: Cost 81, Risk 21, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 28, Durability 37. XITK: Cost 95, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 81, Durability 73.
Pillar letters and Scores for GXDW, XITK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGXDWXITK
Cost30% weightA81A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF21D37Higher
Tradability15% weightD29B65Higher
Holdings10% weightD28A81Higher
Durability5% weightD37A73Higher

Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GXDW and XITK are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Disruptive Innovation⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

XITK ranks 4th and GXDW 15th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.

  1. Rank 1AXTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AKOMPState Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETFScore 83
  3. Rank 3ATRFMAAM Transformers ETFScore 74
  4. Rank 4AXITKState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETFScore 73
  5. Rank 5AGINNGoldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETFScore 70
  6. Rank 14CNBDSNeuberger Berman Disrupters ETFScore 50
  7. Rank 15CGXDWGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETFScore 48
  8. Rank 16CILDRFirst Trust Innovation Leaders ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GXDWCGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF

XITKAState Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

In short

GXDW Momentum traffic control for Global X's own theme lineup. Since its 2025 rebuild, GXDW holds the five Global X thematic ETFs showing the strongest relative strength, and it can reshuffle them monthly as leadership changes.

XITK Most innovation funds pick a theme and hope. XITK lets the data pick: FactSet ranks tech and electronic-media segments by growth, keeps the top quartile, then equal-weights roughly 100 names so no single giant runs the show.

Stated mandate

GXDW The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index.

XITK The fund seeks to track the total return of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index before fees and expenses. Its mandate targets innovative technology-related companies with robust revenue growth and leading-edge products or services.

Why people hold it

  • GXDW Rules, not hunches: the index ranks Global X's thematic ETFs on relative price strength, holds the top five at equal weight, and can reconstitute monthly.globalxetfs.comnasdaq.comglobalxetfs.com 2
  • One ticker covers five themes at once, so you are not maintaining a shelf of single-theme funds or deciding by hand when to swap one out.globalxetfs.com
  • The 0.50% expense ratio runs below the median fee in its disruptive-innovation peer group, and that covers the rotation work too.
  • Selection keys off price behavior rather than earnings forecasts, which makes the process easy to audit: strongest recent trend in, laggards out.globalxetfs.com
  • XITK Costs 0.45% a year, comfortably under the 0.65% median for disruptive-innovation funds, and it does it inside a plain index wrapper from a major ETF shop.
  • Equal weighting at each reset gives the hundredth holding the same slot as the first, so results lean on the whole basket rather than two or three mega-caps.factset.com
  • Screens segments, not slogans: only companies drawing most of their revenue from the fastest-growing corners of tech and electronic media make the cut.factset.comssga.com
  • Trading since 2016, giving it a live record across several tech cycles, and it sits in the upper tier of our innovation-fund cohort review.

Worth knowing

  • GXDW The menu is in-house. The index ranks only Global X's own thematic ETFs, so a leading theme run by another issuer cannot be picked up.globalxetfs.comnasdaq.com
  • Momentum follows price, so themes get added after a run and dropped after they stall. Choppy, trendless markets are the hard case for this design.globalxetfs.com
  • It stays a small, lightly traded fund, so spreads can be wider than the category's household names, and cheaper broad innovation options exist (KOMP charges 0.20%).
  • XITK Growth-screened tech, equal-weighted, means smaller names carry a giant's weight. Expect a rougher ride than a cap-weighted tech fund.
  • Thinly traded for its category and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the household-name tech ETFs.
  • Cheaper shelfmates exist: KOMP runs a broad new-economy basket for 0.20%.

Full GXDW profile⁠

Full XITK profile⁠

GXDW vs XITK Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GXDW vs XITK Cost

Overpaying GXDW vs XITK

$938

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GXDW 0.50%

    $9,979

  • XITK 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GXDW 0.50%
  • XITK 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GXDW $9,979XITK $9,041

Year by year

YearGXDWXITKOverpaying
10$900$812$88
20$3,460$3,128$332
30$9,979$9,041$938

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%GXDW
  • 0.45%XITK, cheaper
  • Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
  • Median 0.65%

XITK 2nd cheapest of 30 funds

GXDW 6th cheapest of 30 funds

GXDW vs XITK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GXDW 1.53%, better
XITK 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GXDW $0.36
XITK None
Last payment
GXDW $0.08
XITK No data
Ex-dividend
GXDW Jun 29, 2026
XITK No data
Paid on
GXDW Jul 7, 2026
XITK No data
Frequency
GXDW Twice a year
XITK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GXDWTwice a year · 14 paymentsAll GXDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2019 $0.08; Jun 29, 2020 $0.02; Dec 30, 2020 $0.19; Jun 29, 2021 $0.11; Dec 30, 2021 $0.59; Jun 29, 2022 $0.04; Dec 29, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2023 $0.11; Dec 28, 2023 $0.38; Jun 27, 2024 $0.13; Dec 30, 2024 $0.13; Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Dec 30, 2025 $0.28; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
XITK9 paymentsAll XITK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2017 $1.36; Dec 24, 2018 $1.24; Dec 23, 2019 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.13; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.05; Jun 20, 2023 $0.0071; Sep 18, 2023 $0.0094; Dec 18, 2023 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

GXDW vs XITK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GXDW
  • XITK
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XITK −61.4% · Nov 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GXDW 25.1%, betterXITK 25.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GXDW 0.14XITK 0.63, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GXDW −60.4%, betterXITK −61.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GXDW 1.72XITK 1.67

Popular comparisons

  • GXDWCvsXTA

    Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsXTA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GXDWCvsKOMPA

    Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsKOMPA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GXDWCvsTRFMA

    Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XITKAvsTRFMA

    State Street SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF · AAM Transformers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.