XT ranks 1st and GXDW 15th of 30 funds in the Disruptive Innovation Category.
GXDW vs XT
XT −0.04pt a year
0.50%0.46%
XT 23.5×the volume
2.94K69.1K
XT +20.5pt
−13.2%+7.3%
GXDW vs XT Performance
−50.7%+42.3%
- GXDW 0.50%
- XT 0.46%, better
- GXDW $6M
- XT $3.98B
- GXDW −14.8%
- XT +20.1%, better
- GXDW 1.53%
- XT 6.82%, better
- GXDW 6
- XT 216
- GXDW 2.94K sh
- XT 69.1K sh, better
- GXDW $23.47
- XT $83.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GXDW | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81 | A95Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F21 | A91Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | B66Higher |
| Durability | D37 | A96Higher |
Rank among Disruptive Innovation funds
Same Category. GXDW and XT are both graded against the same 30 Disruptive Innovation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GXDWC
XTA
In short
GXDW Momentum traffic control for Global X's own theme lineup. Since its 2025 rebuild, GXDW holds the five Global X thematic ETFs showing the strongest relative strength, and it can reshuffle them monthly as leadership changes.
XT Innovation, spread thin on purpose. XT holds roughly 200 global companies scored by Morningstar analysts for exposure to a handful of exponential tech themes, so no single moonshot carries the fund.
Stated mandate
GXDW The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index.
XT XT seeks to track an index of stocks from developed and emerging markets whose companies create or use exponential technologies. The strategy targets technologies with potential economic benefits, including the ability to displace older technologies or create new markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GXDW vs XT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GXDW vs XT Cost
Overpaying GXDW vs XT
$749
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GXDW 0.50%
$9,979
XT 0.46%
$9,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GXDW | XT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $830 | $70 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,195 | $265 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,230 | $749 |
- 0.50%GXDW
- 0.46%XT, cheaper
- Middle half of Disruptive Innovation funds
- Median 0.65%
XT 3rd cheapest of 30 funds
GXDW 6th cheapest of 30 funds
GXDW vs XT Dividends
- GXDW 1.53%
- XT 6.82%, better
- GXDW $0.36
- XT $5.69
- GXDW $0.08
- XT $0.36
- GXDW Jun 29, 2026
- XT Jun 15, 2026
- GXDW Jul 7, 2026
- XT Jun 18, 2026
- GXDW Twice a year
- XT Twice a year
Distribution history
GXDW vs XT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GXDW
- XT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GXDW 25.1%XT 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GXDW 0.14XT 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- GXDW −60.4%XT −34.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GXDW 1.72XT 1.35
GXDW and XT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

