Skip to content
etf.net

ICOP vs TINY

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

ICOPBNasdaq

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

TINYCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ICOP −0.11pt a year

ICOP0.47%TINY0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

ICOP 8.3×the volume

ICOP97.5KTINY11.8K

3Y return · a year

ICOP +4.9pt

ICOP+32.0%TINY+27.1%

ICOP vs TINY Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.6%ICOP+23.3%TINY

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ICOP +23.6%. TINY +23.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%60%80%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ICOP 0.47%, better
TINY 0.58%
Fund size
ICOP $408M
TINY $12M
1Y total return
ICOP +23.6%, better
TINY +23.3%
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
TINY 0.10%
Holdings
ICOP 78
TINY 31
Avg volume (30D)
ICOP 97.5K sh, better
TINY 11.8K sh
NAV per share
ICOP $46.95
TINY $66.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ICOP: Cost 83, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 44, Durability 78. TINY: Cost 53, Risk 32, Mission 56, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for ICOP, TINY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarICOPTINY
Cost30% weightA83HigherC53
Mission25% weightNot scoredB56
Risk15% weightC40HigherD32
Tradability15% weightA81HigherC45
Holdings10% weightC44Not scored
Durability5% weightA78HigherB58

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ICOP and TINY are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

ICOP ranks 4th and TINY 9th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BHAILState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 9CPWRDTCW Transform Systems ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 9CTINYProShares Nanotechnology ETFScore 46
  8. Rank 11CPRNTThe 3D Printing ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ICOPBiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

TINYCProShares Nanotechnology ETF

In short

ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.

TINY Nanotechnology is a theme most fund shelves skip entirely. TINY is ProShares' answer: roughly 30 global companies working at the nanoscale, bundled through one Solactive index into a single ticker.

Stated mandate

ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.

TINY TINY invests in companies whose business operations are in nanotechnology, providing exposure to the emerging nanotechnology theme through a global portfolio.

Why people hold it

  • ICOP At 0.47% a year it is the cheapest fund in the copper-mining cohort, undercutting COPX (0.65%), COPP (0.66%), COPJ (0.75%) and KCOP (0.99%), and sitting below the group's 0.66% median.
  • A rules-based pure play: it follows the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, holding companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining. Miners' shares, not copper futures, and no stock-picking.ishares.com
  • Global by mandate, not by accident: the index reaches U.S. and non-U.S. miners, which is where much of the world's copper actually trades. Distributions are paid quarterly.ishares.com
  • One of the stronger builds in a small copper-mining field, pairing the lowest fee in the group with a mainstream iShares index wrapper.
  • TINY Pure-play access to a theme most shelves skip. It tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, built from companies whose business operations sit in nanotechnology.proshares.com
  • About 30 global holdings, so the theme actually drives the fund instead of sitting as a rounding error inside a broad tech portfolio.
  • 0.58% a year puts it in line with the typical global thematic ETF, even though the mandate is far narrower than most.
  • ProShares has run it since 2021, it pays quarterly, and it stands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group.

Worth knowing

  • ICOP Non-diversified by design: a few dozen miners levered to one metal, with the largest names carrying a big slice. Copper prices and mine-level news drive the ride.ishares.com
  • A large share of the basket is listed outside the U.S., so currency moves and foreign market risks come along with the copper exposure.ishares.com
  • It launched in 2023, so the live record is short, and trading is moderate rather than heavy. Limit orders earn their keep on bigger tickets.
  • TINY Small and thinly traded, which usually means wider bid-ask spreads and more price impact than a mainstream index fund.
  • About 30 stocks in one emerging theme is a concentrated ride, and it can swing harder than a diversified technology fund.
  • Broader thematic funds charge less (KLMT at 0.10%, IQSZ at 0.19%), though neither aims at nanotechnology.

Full ICOP profile⁠

Full TINY profile⁠

ICOP vs TINY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ICOP vs TINY Cost

Overpaying TINY vs ICOP

$2,035

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ICOP 0.47%

    $9,418

  • TINY 0.58%

    $11,453

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ICOP 0.47%
  • TINY 0.58%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530TINY $11,453ICOP $9,418

Year by year

YearICOPTINYOverpaying
10$847$1,041$194
20$3,261$3,986$725
30$9,418$11,453$2,035

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
  • 0.58%TINY
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds

TINY 9th cheapest of 18 funds

ICOP vs TINY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
TINY 0.10%
Payout (12M)
ICOP $0.89
TINY $0.07
Last payment
ICOP $0.27
TINY $0.0083
Ex-dividend
ICOP Jun 15, 2026
TINY Jun 24, 2026
Paid on
ICOP Jun 18, 2026
TINY Jun 30, 2026
Frequency
ICOP Twice a year
TINY Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

ICOPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll ICOP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.55; Jun 11, 2024 $0.05; Dec 17, 2024 $0.42; Jun 16, 2025 $0.30; Dec 16, 2025 $0.59; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Jun 15, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
TINYTwice a year · 12 paymentsAll TINY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2021 $0.03; Jun 22, 2022 $0.003; Sep 21, 2022 $0.06; Dec 22, 2022 $0.05; Mar 22, 2023 $0.02; Sep 20, 2023 $0.05; Dec 20, 2023 $0.07; Sep 25, 2024 $0.0049; Jun 25, 2025 $0.02; Sep 24, 2025 $0.08; Dec 24, 2025 $0.06; Jun 24, 2026 $0.0083. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ICOP vs TINY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ICOP 30.3%, betterTINY 34.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ICOP 0.93, betterTINY 0.74
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ICOP −38.6%since Jun 2023TINY −43.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ICOP 1.34TINY 1.89

Popular comparisons

  • ICOPBvsFITEA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TINYCvsFITEA

    ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ICOPBvsAGNGA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TINYCvsAGNGA

    ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ICOPBvsWRNDB

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • TINYCvsWRNDB

    ProShares Nanotechnology ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.