Skip to content

EMET vs SETM

VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF

EMETCNYSE Arca

Sprott Critical Materials ETF

SETMBNasdaq

Overlap

34.2%by weight

Expense ratio

EMET −0.03pt a year

EMET0.62%SETM0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

SETM 32.3×the volume

EMET4.78KSETM155K

EMET vs SETM Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−14.8%EMET−20.4%SETM

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. EMET −14.8%. SETM −20.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
EMET 0.62%, better
SETM 0.65%
Fund size
EMET $30M
SETM $417M
1Y total return
EMET No data
SETM +6.3%
Yield (12M)
EMET 1.84%, better
SETM 1.74%
Holdings
EMET 62
SETM 158
Avg volume (30D)
EMET 4.78K sh
SETM 155K sh, better
NAV per share
EMET $35.65
SETM $24.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMET: Cost 58, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 42, Holdings 68, Durability 62. SETM: Cost 38, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 80, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMET, SETM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMETSETM
Cost30% weightB58HigherD38
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53HigherC51
Tradability15% weightC42A81Higher
Holdings10% weightB68A80Higher
Durability5% weightB62B64Higher

Rank among Critical Materials funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMET and SETM are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Critical Materials⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

SETM ranks 4th and EMET 5th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.

  1. Rank 1AREMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BEARTGlobal X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BSETMSprott Critical Materials ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5CEMETVanEck Copper and Green Metals ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 6CFMTLFirst Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EMETCVanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF

SETMBSprott Critical Materials ETF

In short

EMET Copper is the spine of electrification, but wiring a grid takes a whole shelf of metals. EMET tracks a global index of the companies that mine, refine and recycle them, about 60 names, for 0.62% a year.

SETM Most funds in this corner pick a lane: lithium, or rare earths. SETM tracks an index built to span the wider critical-materials complex, roughly 160 miners and processors in a single basket.

Stated mandate

EMET The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Electrification Metals Index. That index covers companies involved in producing, refining, processing, and recycling metals critical to global electrification.

SETM SETM seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.

Why people hold it

  • EMET The mandate reaches past the mine: the index covers producing, refining, processing and recycling of electrification metals, so midstream and scrap names qualify too.vaneck.com
  • 0.62% a year sits just under the midpoint of its critical-materials peer group, and the hunting ground is global rather than one country's mining sector.
  • Not a one-metal wager: copper sits alongside the other metals the index treats as critical to electrification, spread across roughly 60 companies.
  • SETM Peers narrow to one metal (ILIT for lithium, REMX and EART for rare earths). SETM holds roughly 160 miners and processors across the theme, in one rules-based index.
  • The 0.65% fee lands right at the middle of the critical-materials pack. Breadth here does not carry a premium price tag.
  • Real size for a niche theme, with regular daily volume behind it. That tends to mean easier fills than the thinnest shelves in mining ETFs.
  • Fully index-driven: the fund aims to match the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index before fees, so the holdings follow a published rulebook rather than a manager's call.

Worth knowing

  • EMET One of the smaller, more thinly traded funds in this corner of the market, so the real cost of getting in and out can exceed the headline fee.
  • Broader metals exposure comes cheaper: PICK (0.39%) and VanEck's own REMX (0.53%) undercut it, though neither is built around the electrification basket.
  • Miner equities move with metal prices, and with a 2021 launch this one has not yet run through a full commodity cycle.
  • SETM Mining exposure comes cheaper elsewhere in the group: PICK runs 0.39%, REMX 0.53%. The extra basis points buy Sprott's particular definition of critical materials.
  • Miner shares move with commodity prices and government policy, so a single-theme equity basket can swing hard in both directions.
  • Income is not the job here. Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, not on a monthly rhythm.

Full EMET profile⁠

Full SETM profile⁠

EMET vs SETM Holdings

How EMET and SETM differ

Overlap by weight

34.2%

Shared holdings make up 51.6% of EMET and 46.7% of SETM.

Level by level

  • Holdings24 in both34.2%
  • Countryby domicile52.3%
  • Sector4 Sectors75.6%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in EMET and SETM, widest gap first
SectorMore in EMETMore in SETMGap
EnergySETM +24.3 points
MaterialsEMET +23.4 points
IndustrialsEMET +0.9 points
Consumer StaplesSETM +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EMET and SETM, widest gap first
CountryMore in EMETMore in SETMGap
CanadaSETM +17.7 points
AustraliaSETM +15.4 points
United KingdomEMET +11.6 points
ChinaEMET +9.9 points
South AfricaEMET +8.6 points
MexicoEMET +7.9 points
United StatesSETM +7.3 points
SwedenEMET +3.9 points
Other countries (12)SETM +1.6 points

Outside the US: EMET 58% developed, 42% emerging. SETM 81% developed, 19% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EMET55.1%
  • SETM40.3%

Securities held

  • EMET57
  • SETM157

Asset class

EMET
Stocks
SETM
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in EMET33
  • In both24
  • Only in SETM133

Only in EMET

33 securities, 48.2% of EMET by weight

  • Anglo American Plc8.99%
  • Grupo Mexico Sab De Cv7.80%
  • Boliden Ab3.92%

Only in SETM

133 securities, 52.9% of SETM by weight

  • Cameco Corp.4.83%
  • NAC Kazatomprom JSC4.26%
  • Hecla Mining Co.3.41%

Weight gaps

All 24 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in EMET and SETM, widest gap first
HoldingMore in EMETMore in SETMGap
Lynas Rare Earths LtdSETM +3.57 points
Teck Resources LtdTECKEMET +3.48 points
Freeport-Mcmoran IncFCXEMET +2.81 points
Pilbara Minerals LtdSETM +2.21 points
Southern Copper CorpSCCOEMET +2.18 points
Antofagasta PlcANTO.LEMET +2.04 points
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SaSQMSETM +1.62 points
Mp Materials CorpMPSETM +1.57 points

All 62 EMET holdings⁠All 157 SETM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMET vs SETM Cost

Overpaying SETM vs EMET

$538

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMET 0.62%

    $12,179

  • SETM 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMET 0.62%
  • SETM 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SETM $12,717EMET $12,179

Year by year

YearEMETSETMOverpaying
10$1,111$1,163$52
20$4,246$4,440$194
30$12,179$12,717$538

Expense ratio

  • 0.62%EMET, cheaper
  • 0.65%SETM
  • Middle half of Critical Materials funds
  • Median 0.64%

EMET 6th cheapest of 12 funds

SETM 7th cheapest of 12 funds

EMET vs SETM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
EMET 1.84%, better
SETM 1.74%
Payout (12M)
EMET $0.68
SETM $0.45
Last payment
EMET $0.68
SETM $0.45
Ex-dividend
EMET Dec 22, 2025
SETM Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
EMET Dec 26, 2025
SETM Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
EMET Annual
SETM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

EMETAnnual · 4 paymentsAll EMET payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2022 $0.73; Dec 18, 2023 $0.49; Dec 23, 2024 $0.39; Dec 22, 2025 $0.68. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
SETMAnnual · 3 paymentsAll SETM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2023 $0.44; Dec 12, 2024 $0.31; Dec 18, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

EMET vs SETM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMET No dataSETM 36.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMET No dataSETM 0.49
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMET No dataSETM −42.8%since Feb 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMET 1.02SETM 1.22

EMET and SETM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • EMETCvsREMXA

    VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SETMBvsREMXA

    Sprott Critical Materials ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMETCvsEARTB

    VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SETMBvsEARTB

    Sprott Critical Materials ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMETCvsILITB

    VanEck Copper and Green Metals ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SETMBvsILITB

    Sprott Critical Materials ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.