ROM ranks 3rd and INDL 79th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
INDL vs ROM
ROM −0.30pt a year
1.23%0.93%
ROM 3.1×the volume
15.4K47.7K
ROM +38.9pt
−2.3%+36.6%
INDL vs ROM Performance
−27.4%+126.1%
- INDL 1.23%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- INDL $53M
- ROM $1.15B
- INDL −28.1%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- INDL 1.26%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- INDL 8
- ROM 85
- INDL 15.4K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- INDL $40.50
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INDL | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B62 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. INDL and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INDLD
ROMA
In short
INDL Most leveraged ETFs double down on the Dow or the Nasdaq. INDL aims a 2x daily multiplier at India instead, tracking the MSCI India Index since 2010. Built as a single-day trading tool, not a long-term India position.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
INDL The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the MSCI India Index before fees and expenses, with the objective applying for a single day.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INDL vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INDL vs ROM Cost
Overpaying INDL vs ROM
$4,772
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INDL 1.23%
$22,311
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INDL | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,148 | $1,644 | $504 |
| 20 | $7,989 | $6,199 | $1,790 |
| 30 | $22,311 | $17,539 | $4,772 |
- 1.23%INDL
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
INDL 88th cheapest of 95 funds
INDL vs ROM Dividends
- INDL 1.26%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- INDL $0.52
- ROM $0.04
- INDL $0.09
- ROM $0.02
- INDL Sep 22, 2026
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- INDL Sep 29, 2026
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- INDL Quarterly
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
INDL vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INDL
- ROM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INDL 26.9%, betterROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- INDL −0.10ROM 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- INDL −49.4%, betterROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- INDL 0.77ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 1.23% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.23% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.23% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.