ISTB ranks 2nd and NBSD 10th of 12 funds in the Short-Term Core Bond Category.
ISTB vs NBSD
ISTB −0.36pt a year
0.06%0.42%
ISTB 1.6×the volume
523K317K
ISTB vs NBSD Performance
+1.7%+2.7%
- ISTB 0.06%, better
- NBSD 0.42%
- ISTB $5.35B
- NBSD $1.75B
- ISTB +1.7%
- NBSD +2.7%, better
- ISTB 4.34%
- NBSD 4.76%, better
- ISTB 7551
- NBSD 1196
- ISTB 523K sh, better
- NBSD 317K sh
- ISTB $47.59
- NBSD $49.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ISTB | NBSD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F12 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A73Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | A79Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A90Higher | B59 |
Rank among Short-Term Core Bond funds
Same Category. ISTB and NBSD are both graded against the same 12 Short-Term Core Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ISTBA
NBSDD
In short
ISTB The Agg with the long end trimmed off, plus a dash of high yield. ISTB tracks a broad USD bond index that stops at five-year maturities, so you get core bond plumbing with a fraction of the rate sensitivity, for six basis points.
NBSD A 1986 mutual fund that swapped into an ETF wrapper in 2024: same team, same mandate. It hunts the highest current income it can find in investment-grade bonds while holding duration to three years or less, and pays monthly.
Stated mandate
ISTB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar bonds rated investment grade or high yield, with remaining maturities from one to five years.
NBSD The fund seeks the highest available current income while maintaining liquidity and limiting principal risk; total return is secondary. It invests at least 80% of net assets in investment-grade fixed- and floating-rate debt and normally targets average portfolio duration of three years or less.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ISTB vs NBSD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ISTB vs NBSD Cost
Overpaying NBSD vs ISTB
$7,202
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ISTB 0.06%
$1,270
NBSD 0.42%
$8,472
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ISTB | NBSD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $759 | $649 |
| 20 | $432 | $2,927 | $2,495 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $8,472 | $7,202 |
- 0.06%ISTB, cheaper
- 0.42%NBSD
- Middle half of Short-Term Core Bond funds
- Median 0.20%
ISTB 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
NBSD 11th cheapest of 12 funds
ISTB vs NBSD Dividends
- ISTB 4.34%
- NBSD 4.76%, better
- ISTB $2.07
- NBSD $2.38
- ISTB $0.17
- NBSD $0.21
- ISTB Oct 1, 2026
- NBSD Oct 27, 2026
- ISTB Oct 6, 2026
- NBSD Oct 30, 2026
- ISTB Monthly
- NBSD Monthly
Distribution history
ISTB vs NBSD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ISTB 2.5%NBSD 2.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ISTB 0.24NBSD 0.48
- Worst fall
- ISTB −8.8%NBSD −2.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ISTB 0.39NBSD 0.26
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.