BSV ranks 1st and NBSD 10th of 12 funds in the Short-Term Core Bond Category.
BSV vs NBSD
BSV −0.39pt a year
0.03%0.42%
BSV 9.0×the volume
2.86M317K
BSV vs NBSD Performance
+1.6%+2.7%
- BSV 0.03%, better
- NBSD 0.42%
- BSV $69.6B
- NBSD $1.75B
- BSV +1.6%
- NBSD +2.7%, better
- BSV 4.08%
- NBSD 4.76%, better
- BSV 3159
- NBSD 1196
- BSV 2.86M sh, better
- NBSD 317K sh
- BSV $77.05
- NBSD $49.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSV | NBSD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F12 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A86Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A95Higher | B59 |
Rank among Short-Term Core Bond funds
Same Category. BSV and NBSD are both graded against the same 12 Short-Term Core Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSVA
NBSDD
In short
BSV The short end of Vanguard's bond lineup: investment-grade US government and corporate paper capped at one to five years, for three basis points a year. Same indexing discipline as its total-market sibling, with far less rate whiplash.
NBSD A 1986 mutual fund that swapped into an ETF wrapper in 2024: same team, same mandate. It hunts the highest current income it can find in investment-grade bonds while holding duration to three years or less, and pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BSV The fund seeks to track a market-weighted bond index with a short-term dollar-weighted average maturity.
NBSD The fund seeks the highest available current income while maintaining liquidity and limiting principal risk; total return is secondary. It invests at least 80% of net assets in investment-grade fixed- and floating-rate debt and normally targets average portfolio duration of three years or less.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSV vs NBSD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSV vs NBSD Cost
Overpaying NBSD vs BSV
$7,834
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSV 0.03%
$638
NBSD 0.42%
$8,472
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSV | NBSD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $759 | $704 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,927 | $2,711 |
| 30 | $638 | $8,472 | $7,834 |
- 0.03%BSV, cheaper
- 0.42%NBSD
- Middle half of Short-Term Core Bond funds
- Median 0.20%
BSV cheapest of 12 funds
NBSD 11th cheapest of 12 funds
BSV vs NBSD Dividends
- BSV 4.08%
- NBSD 4.76%, better
- BSV $3.15
- NBSD $2.38
- BSV $0.27
- NBSD $0.21
- BSV Oct 1, 2026
- NBSD Oct 27, 2026
- BSV Oct 5, 2026
- NBSD Oct 30, 2026
- BSV Monthly
- NBSD Monthly
Distribution history
BSV vs NBSD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSV 2.4%NBSD 2.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSV 0.06NBSD 0.48
- Worst fall
- BSV −8.0%NBSD −2.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BSV 0.38NBSD 0.26
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.