SHAG ranks 4th and NBSD 10th of 12 funds in the Short-Term Core Bond Category.
NBSD vs SHAG
SHAG −0.30pt a year
0.42%0.12%
NBSD 13.1×the volume
317K24.2K
NBSD vs SHAG Performance
+2.7%+1.5%
- NBSD 0.42%
- SHAG 0.12%, better
- NBSD $1.75B
- SHAG $75M
- NBSD +2.7%, better
- SHAG +1.5%
- NBSD 4.76%, better
- SHAG 4.32%
- NBSD 1196
- SHAG 1220
- NBSD 317K sh, better
- SHAG 24.2K sh
- NBSD $49.91
- SHAG $46.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NBSD | SHAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A80Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B57Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | F24 | B65Higher |
| Durability | B59Higher | C44 |
Rank among Short-Term Core Bond funds
Same Category. NBSD and SHAG are both graded against the same 12 Short-Term Core Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NBSDD
SHAGB
In short
NBSD A 1986 mutual fund that swapped into an ETF wrapper in 2024: same team, same mandate. It hunts the highest current income it can find in investment-grade bonds while holding duration to three years or less, and pays monthly.
SHAG Short-duration bonds with a twist: SHAG follows an index that reshuffles the short-term investment-grade universe toward its higher-yielding corners, and charges 0.12% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
NBSD The fund seeks the highest available current income while maintaining liquidity and limiting principal risk; total return is secondary. It invests at least 80% of net assets in investment-grade fixed- and floating-rate debt and normally targets average portfolio duration of three years or less.
SHAG The fund seeks to follow, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Short Aggregate Enhanced Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NBSD vs SHAG Holdings
How NBSD and SHAG differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country92.5%
Sector
No Sector split for NBSD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NBSDMore in SHAG | NBSD | SHAG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cayman Islands | NBSD +6.6 points | 7.0% | 0.4% |
| Japan | SHAG +1.6 points | 0.4% | 2.0% |
| Canada | SHAG +1.1 points | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| United Kingdom | SHAG +0.9 points | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Indonesia | SHAG +0.5 points | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Mexico | SHAG +0.5 points | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| China | SHAG +0.5 points | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Other countries (20) | SHAG +1.4 points | 90.5% | 91.9% |
Concentration
- NBSD54.3%
- SHAG16.7%
- NBSD1,196
- SHAG1,217
Asset class
- NBSD
- Fixed Income
- SHAG
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. NBSD holds 1,196 securities, SHAG 1,217.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NBSD vs SHAG Cost
Overpaying NBSD vs SHAG
$5,952
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NBSD 0.42%
$8,472
SHAG 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NBSD | SHAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $220 | $539 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $859 | $2,068 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $2,520 | $5,952 |
- 0.42%NBSD
- 0.12%SHAG, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Term Core Bond funds
- Median 0.20%
SHAG 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
NBSD 11th cheapest of 12 funds
NBSD vs SHAG Dividends
- NBSD 4.76%, better
- SHAG 4.32%
- NBSD $2.38
- SHAG $2.02
- NBSD $0.21
- SHAG $0.18
- NBSD Oct 27, 2026
- SHAG Oct 27, 2026
- NBSD Oct 30, 2026
- SHAG Oct 29, 2026
- NBSD Monthly
- SHAG Monthly
Distribution history
NBSD vs SHAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NBSD 2.2%SHAG 2.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- NBSD 0.48SHAG 0.14
- Worst fall
- NBSD −2.6%SHAG −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- NBSD 0.26SHAG 0.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.