SCHA ranks 1st and IWC 13th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
IWC vs SCHA
SCHA −0.57pt a year
0.60%0.03%
SCHA 24.3×the volume
126K3.05M
SCHA +0.4pt
+10.1%+10.5%
IWC vs SCHA Performance
+21.0%+30.4%
- IWC 0.60%
- SCHA 0.03%, better
- IWC $1.19B
- SCHA $21.7B
- IWC +20.7%
- SCHA +21.8%, better
- IWC 1.09%
- SCHA 1.11%, better
- IWC 1363
- SCHA 1738
- IWC 126K sh
- SCHA 3.05M sh, better
- IWC $172.25
- SCHA $32.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWC | SCHA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A96Higher |
| Risk | D25 | D38Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A77Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. IWC and SCHA are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWCC
SCHAA
In short
IWC Most small-cap funds stop short of here. Since 2005, IWC has tracked the Russell Microcap Index, buying the smallest sliver of the US market in one ticket instead of one lottery-ticket stock at a time.
SCHA Schwab's small-cap workhorse: three basis points, roughly 1,700 companies, and a mandate to hold the slice of the US market that sits below the large and mid caps. Running since 2009.
Stated mandate
IWC The fund aims to follow the results of an index made up of U.S. micro-cap equities, using the Russell Microcap Index as its underlying index.
SCHA The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in that index’s small-cap stocks and normally places at least 90% of net assets in them.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWC vs SCHA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWC vs SCHA Cost
Overpaying IWC vs SCHA
$11,179
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWC 0.60%
$11,817
SCHA 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWC | SCHA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $55 | $1,021 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $216 | $3,900 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $638 | $11,179 |
- 0.60%IWC
- 0.03%SCHA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
SCHA cheapest of 16 funds
IWC 14th cheapest of 16 funds
IWC vs SCHA Dividends
- IWC 1.09%
- SCHA 1.11%, better
- IWC $1.94
- SCHA $0.37
- IWC $0.45
- SCHA $0.10
- IWC Sep 15, 2026
- SCHA Sep 23, 2026
- IWC Sep 18, 2026
- SCHA Sep 28, 2026
- IWC Twice a year
- SCHA Quarterly
Distribution history
IWC vs SCHA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWC
- SCHA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWC 21.6%SCHA 18.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWC 0.96, betterSCHA 0.88
- Worst fall
- IWC −40.4%SCHA −30.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IWC 1.36SCHA 1.13
IWC and SCHA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

