VB ranks 2nd and IWC 13th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
IWC vs VB
VB −0.57pt a year
0.60%0.03%
VB 3.9×the volume
126K491K
VB +0.9pt
+10.1%+11.0%
IWC vs VB Performance
+21.0%+33.0%
- IWC 0.60%
- VB 0.03%, better
- IWC $1.19B
- VB $76.9B
- IWC +20.7%, better
- VB +17.8%
- IWC 1.09%
- VB 1.24%, better
- IWC 1363
- VB 1309
- IWC 126K sh
- VB 491K sh, better
- IWC $172.25
- VB $285.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWC | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A86 |
| Risk | D25 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | B59Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. IWC and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWCC
VBA
In short
IWC Most small-cap funds stop short of here. Since 2005, IWC has tracked the Russell Microcap Index, buying the smallest sliver of the US market in one ticket instead of one lottery-ticket stock at a time.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
IWC The fund aims to follow the results of an index made up of U.S. micro-cap equities, using the Russell Microcap Index as its underlying index.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWC vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWC vs VB Cost
Overpaying IWC vs VB
$11,179
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWC 0.60%
$11,817
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWC | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $55 | $1,021 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $216 | $3,900 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $638 | $11,179 |
- 0.60%IWC
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
IWC 14th cheapest of 16 funds
IWC vs VB Dividends
- IWC 1.09%
- VB 1.24%, better
- IWC $1.94
- VB $3.65
- IWC $0.45
- VB $0.85
- IWC Sep 15, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- IWC Sep 18, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- IWC Twice a year
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
IWC vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWC
- VB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWC 21.6%VB 16.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWC 0.96, betterVB 0.89
- Worst fall
- IWC −40.4%VB −28.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IWC 1.36VB 1.07
IWC and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



