VTWO ranks 3rd and IWC 13th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
IWC vs VTWO
VTWO −0.54pt a year
0.60%0.06%
VTWO 11.9×the volume
126K1.5M
VTWO +0.1pt
+10.1%+10.2%
IWC vs VTWO Performance
+21.0%+25.6%
- IWC 0.60%
- VTWO 0.06%, better
- IWC $1.19B
- VTWO $16.6B
- IWC +20.7%, better
- VTWO +18.3%
- IWC 1.09%
- VTWO 1.19%, better
- IWC 1363
- VTWO 2002
- IWC 126K sh
- VTWO 1.5M sh, better
- IWC $172.25
- VTWO $110.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWC | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D25 | D38Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | B69Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A81Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. IWC and VTWO are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWCC
VTWOA
In short
IWC Most small-cap funds stop short of here. Since 2005, IWC has tracked the Russell Microcap Index, buying the smallest sliver of the US market in one ticket instead of one lottery-ticket stock at a time.
VTWO The Russell 2000 is the small-cap benchmark every headline quotes. VTWO is Vanguard's cheap seat on it: about 2,000 small US companies for 0.06% a year, a fraction of the fee on the best-known fund tracking the same index.
Stated mandate
IWC The fund aims to follow the results of an index made up of U.S. micro-cap equities, using the Russell Microcap Index as its underlying index.
VTWO The fund invests in stocks in the Russell 2000 Index and seeks to closely track that index's return, representing small-cap U.S. stock exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWC vs VTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWC vs VTWO Cost
Overpaying IWC vs VTWO
$10,547
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWC 0.60%
$11,817
VTWO 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWC | VTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $110 | $966 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $432 | $3,684 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $1,270 | $10,547 |
- 0.60%IWC
- 0.06%VTWO, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VTWO 4th cheapest of 16 funds
IWC 14th cheapest of 16 funds
IWC vs VTWO Dividends
- IWC 1.09%
- VTWO 1.19%, better
- IWC $1.94
- VTWO $1.36
- IWC $0.45
- VTWO $0.39
- IWC Sep 15, 2026
- VTWO Sep 23, 2026
- IWC Sep 18, 2026
- VTWO Sep 25, 2026
- IWC Twice a year
- VTWO Quarterly
Distribution history
IWC vs VTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWC
- VTWO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWC 21.6%VTWO 19.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWC 0.96, betterVTWO 0.86
- Worst fall
- IWC −40.4%VTWO −31.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IWC 1.36VTWO 1.15
IWC and VTWO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



