QLVE ranks 5th and JHEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
JHEM vs QLVE
QLVE −0.31pt a year
0.49%0.18%
JHEM 145.9×the volume
59.5K408
JHEM +0.5pt
+7.2%+6.7%
JHEM vs QLVE Performance
+41.7%+38.1%
- JHEM 0.49%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- JHEM $887M
- QLVE $16M
- JHEM +16.6%, better
- QLVE +11.4%
- JHEM 1.91%
- QLVE 3.19%, better
- JHEM 891
- QLVE 156
- JHEM 59.5K sh, better
- QLVE 408 sh
- JHEM $36.19
- QLVE $31.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JHEM | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | C49 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | C51Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | B59Higher | D32 |
| Durability | B59Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. JHEM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JHEMC
QLVEB
In short
JHEM Dimensional designs the index, John Hancock wraps it in an ETF: roughly 900 emerging-market stocks, sorted country by country toward cheaper, more profitable, smaller companies. Fee is 0.49%, net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
JHEM The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, investment results that closely correspond to the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JHEM vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JHEM vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying JHEM vs QLVE
$6,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JHEM 0.49%
$9,792
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JHEM | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $328 | $555 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $1,281 | $2,113 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $3,749 | $6,043 |
- 0.49%JHEM
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
JHEM 14th cheapest of 20 funds
JHEM vs QLVE Dividends
- JHEM 1.91%
- QLVE 3.19%, better
- JHEM $0.71
- QLVE $1.02
- JHEM $0.20
- QLVE $0.34
- JHEM Jun 26, 2026
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- JHEM Jun 30, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- JHEM Twice a year
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
JHEM vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JHEM
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JHEM 15.3%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JHEM 0.99QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- JHEM −29.1%QLVE −23.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JHEM 1.11QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.