JPEM ranks 6th and QLVE 7th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
JPEM vs QLVE
QLVE −0.26pt a year
0.44%0.18%
JPEM 43.2×the volume
17.4K404
QLVE +0.4pt
+6.4%+6.8%
JPEM vs QLVE Performance
+36.6%+38.9%
- JPEM 0.44%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- JPEM $362M
- QLVE $16M
- JPEM +7.6%
- QLVE +10.7%, better
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- QLVE 3.19%
- JPEM 562
- QLVE 155
- JPEM 17.4K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- JPEM $61.28
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JPEM | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | B63Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A72Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. JPEM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JPEMB
QLVEB
In short
JPEM A 2015-vintage multifactor read on emerging markets: JPMorgan spreads roughly 600 names across value, quality and momentum rather than letting the biggest companies set the weights.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
JPEM The fund is designed to provide emerging-markets equity exposure with potentially improved risk-adjusted returns versus a market-cap-weighted index.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JPEM vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JPEM vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying JPEM vs QLVE
$5,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JPEM 0.44%
$8,852
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JPEM | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $794 | $328 | $466 |
| 20 | $3,061 | $1,281 | $1,780 |
| 30 | $8,852 | $3,749 | $5,103 |
- 0.44%JPEM
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
JPEM 10th cheapest of 20 funds
JPEM vs QLVE Dividends
- JPEM 4.68%, better
- QLVE 3.19%
- JPEM $2.88
- QLVE $1.02
- JPEM $0.80
- QLVE $0.34
- JPEM Sep 22, 2026
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- JPEM Sep 24, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- JPEM Quarterly
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
JPEM vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JPEM
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JPEM 10.1%, betterQLVE 11.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- JPEM 0.88QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- JPEM −21.6%, betterQLVE −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- JPEM 0.64QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.44% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.