Skip to content
etf.net

JULV vs PSFO

VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July

JULV—NYSE Arca

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.01pt a year

JULV0.50%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JULV 73.6×the volume

JULV524KPSFO7.12K

JULV vs PSFO Performance

Oct 2, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−0.7%JULV−1.1%PSFO

Oct 2, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. JULV −0.7%. PSFO −1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−0.5%0%0.5%Oct 2Oct 16Nov 2
Expense ratio
JULV 0.50%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
JULV $77M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
JULV No data
PSFO +11.2%
Holdings
JULV 3
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
JULV 524K sh, better
PSFO 7.12K sh
NAV per share
JULV $30.78
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —JULVNot yet graded
PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULV, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULVPSFO
Cost30% weightNot scoredA85
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightNot scoredD29
Tradability15% weightNot scoredC46
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightNot scoredB59

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

How we build Categories ›

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 3rd of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 3BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 59
  6. JULVNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULV—VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

JULV No data

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

JULV No data

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

JULV No data

  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

JULV No data

  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full JULV profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

JULV vs PSFO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULV vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying JULV vs PSFO

$187

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULV 0.50%

    $9,979

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULV 0.50%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530JULV $9,979PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearJULVPSFOOverpaying
10$900$883$17
20$3,460$3,394$66
30$9,979$9,792$187

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%JULV
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

JULV 5th cheapest of 24 funds

JULV vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
JULV None
PSFO None

Distribution history

JULVAll JULV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULV vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULV No dataPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULV No dataPSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULV No dataPSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULV 0.00PSFO 0.50

JULV and PSFO in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • JULV—vsBALTB

    VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULV—vsPSFJB

    VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULV—vsPSFDB

    VanEck U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.