Skip to content

JULW vs PSFJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF

JULWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

PSFJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFJ −0.25pt a year

JULW0.74%PSFJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JULW 2.2×the volume

JULW23.6KPSFJ10.6K

5Y return · a year

PSFJ +1.9pt

JULW+8.9%PSFJ+10.8%

JULW vs PSFJ Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+53.0%JULW+66.7%PSFJ

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. JULW +53.0%. PSFJ +66.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JULW 0.74%
PSFJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
JULW $254M
PSFJ $57M
1Y total return
JULW +7.0%
PSFJ +9.1%, better
Yield (12M)
JULW 0.00%
PSFJ No data
Holdings
JULW 2
PSFJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
JULW 23.6K sh, better
PSFJ 10.6K sh
NAV per share
JULW $41.45
PSFJ $35.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JULW: Cost 37, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 63, Durability 77. PSFJ: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULW, PSFJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULWPSFJ
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC49HigherD30
Tradability15% weightB67HigherC51
Holdings10% weightB63Not scored
Durability5% weightA77HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JULW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFJ ranks 2nd and JULW 12th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 13CJUNWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF

PSFJBPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

In short

JULW JULW has held the July slot in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder since 2020: it aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses over each 12-month outcome period, with upside capped in exchange.

PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.

Stated mandate

JULW The Fund pursues a buffered outcome strategy intended to match the returns of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It seeks to protect the first 20% of index losses during the outcome period, while gains are limited by a cap.

PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • JULW Sits at the deep end of the buffer scale. The fund aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses across a 12-month outcome period.allianzim.com
  • One slot in a 12-month ladder, so the July start date is a choice, not an inheritance. JULW has run that slot since its 2020 launch.allianzim.com
  • The 0.74% fee lands right at the median for 20% buffer funds on the S&P 500, not a premium for the insurer's name on the door.
  • Among the sturdier builds in its deep-buffer peer group, with no structural quirks flagged in our review.
  • PSFJ Costs 0.49% a year against a 0.74% median for 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, and undercuts the 0.74% AllianzIM month-series funds (JUNW, AUGW, DECW) built on the same reference.
  • Deep cushion by design: it aims to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each roughly one-year period, before fees and expenses.paceretfs.com
  • Live since 2021, with several annual reset cycles behind it and sibling funds (PSFM, PSFD) covering other start months. One of the stronger builds in a crowded 20% buffer field.

Worth knowing

  • JULW Buffer and cap are measured start to finish of each July outcome period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room is left, not the headline 20%.
  • The reference is the S&P 500 price index, so index dividends sit outside the math, and the fund is not built to pay income.
  • Cheaper ways to buy a 20% buffer exist: PBFR at 0.50% and PSFJ at 0.49%, against 0.74% here.
  • PSFJ The price of the cushion is a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level set when each July outcome period begins, so a roaring market leaves gains on the table.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and the cushion remaining and the room left to run differ from the stated terms.paceretfs.com
  • A smaller, thinly traded fund, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest names in the group. Income is not part of the design either.

Full JULW profile⁠

Full PSFJ profile⁠

JULW vs PSFJ Holdings

How JULW and PSFJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULW and 0.0% of PSFJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in JULW and PSFJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in JULWMore in PSFJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JULW and PSFJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in JULWMore in PSFJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JULW102.8%
  • PSFJ103.1%

Securities held

  • JULW2
  • PSFJ3

Asset class

JULW
Equity
PSFJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JULW2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFJ3

Only in JULW

2 securities, 100% of JULW by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 5.60 C98.71%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.10%

Only in PSFJ

3 securities, 100% of PSFJ by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 8.36 C97.95%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P4.02%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 448.06 P0.37%

Weight gaps

JULW and PSFJ share no securities.

All 5 JULW holdings⁠All 7 PSFJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULW vs PSFJ Cost

Overpaying JULW vs PSFJ

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULW 0.74%
  • PSFJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JULW $14,307PSFJ $9,792

Year by year

YearJULWPSFJOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JULW
  • 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds

JULW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

JULW vs PSFJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
JULW 0.00%
PSFJ No data
Payout (12M)
JULW None
PSFJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2020, same scale for both

JULW1 paymentAll JULW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2020. Dec 15, 2020 $0.58. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502020
PSFJAll PSFJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULW vs PSFJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JULW
  • PSFJ
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PSFJ −12.2% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−4%−3%−2%−1%0%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULW 5.4%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULW 1.41PSFJ 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULW −9.5%, betterPSFJ −12.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULW 0.38PSFJ 0.55

Popular comparisons

  • JULWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFJBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.