PSFJ ranks 2nd and JULW 12th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
JULW vs PSFJ
0.0%by weight
PSFJ −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
JULW 2.2×the volume
23.6K10.6K
PSFJ +1.9pt
+8.9%+10.8%
JULW vs PSFJ Performance
+53.0%+66.7%
- JULW 0.74%
- PSFJ 0.49%, better
- JULW $254M
- PSFJ $57M
- JULW +7.0%
- PSFJ +9.1%, better
- JULW 0.00%
- PSFJ
- JULW 2
- PSFJ 4
- JULW 23.6K sh, better
- PSFJ 10.6K sh
- JULW $41.45
- PSFJ $35.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULW | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A77Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. JULW and PSFJ are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULWC
PSFJB
In short
JULW JULW has held the July slot in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder since 2020: it aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses over each 12-month outcome period, with upside capped in exchange.
PSFJ A 20% cushion against the S&P 500's first losses, paid for with a ceiling on the upside, reset every July 1. Pacer runs the trade for less than most of the deep-buffer crowd charges.
Stated mandate
JULW The Fund pursues a buffered outcome strategy intended to match the returns of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It seeks to protect the first 20% of index losses during the outcome period, while gains are limited by a cap.
PSFJ The Fund seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 20% of downside losses over an approximate one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULW vs PSFJ Holdings
How JULW and PSFJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULW and 0.0% of PSFJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in JULWMore in PSFJ | JULW | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JULWMore in PSFJ | JULW | PSFJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- JULW102.8%
- PSFJ103.1%
- JULW2
- PSFJ3
Asset class
- JULW
- Equity
- PSFJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in JULW2
- In both0
- Only in PSFJ3
Only in JULW
2 securities, 100% of JULW by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 5.60 C98.71%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.10%
Only in PSFJ
3 securities, 100% of PSFJ by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 8.36 C97.95%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.77 P4.02%
- Spy 06/30/2027 448.06 P0.37%
Weight gaps
JULW and PSFJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULW vs PSFJ Cost
Overpaying JULW vs PSFJ
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULW | PSFJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%JULW
- 0.49%PSFJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFJ cheapest of 24 funds
JULW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
JULW vs PSFJ Dividends
- JULW 0.00%
- PSFJ
- JULW None
- PSFJ None
Distribution history
JULW vs PSFJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JULW
- PSFJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULW 5.4%, betterPSFJ 7.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULW 1.41PSFJ 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- JULW −9.5%, betterPSFJ −12.2%
- Market sensitivity
- JULW 0.38PSFJ 0.55
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.