Skip to content

JULW vs PSFO

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF

JULWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

PSFOBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PSFO −0.25pt a year

JULW0.74%PSFO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JULW 3.3×the volume

JULW23.6KPSFO7.12K

5Y return · a year

PSFO +1.9pt

JULW+8.9%PSFO+10.8%

JULW vs PSFO Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+53.0%JULW+67.0%PSFO

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. JULW +53.0%. PSFO +67.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JULW 0.74%
PSFO 0.49%, better
Fund size
JULW $254M
PSFO $47M
1Y total return
JULW +7.0%
PSFO +11.2%, better
Yield (12M)
JULW 0.00%
PSFO No data
Holdings
JULW 2
PSFO 4
Avg volume (30D)
JULW 23.6K sh, better
PSFO 7.12K sh
NAV per share
JULW $41.45
PSFO $35.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JULW: Cost 37, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 63, Durability 77. PSFO: Cost 85, Risk 29, Mission 95, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULW, PSFO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULWPSFO
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC49HigherD29
Tradability15% weightB67HigherC46
Holdings10% weightB63Not scored
Durability5% weightA77HigherB59

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JULW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFO ranks 3rd and JULW 12th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 3BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BPSFMPacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETFScore 59
  6. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51
  8. Rank 13CJUNWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETFScore 49

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF

PSFOBPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

In short

JULW JULW has held the July slot in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder since 2020: it aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses over each 12-month outcome period, with upside capped in exchange.

PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.

Stated mandate

JULW The Fund pursues a buffered outcome strategy intended to match the returns of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It seeks to protect the first 20% of index losses during the outcome period, while gains are limited by a cap.

PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

Why people hold it

  • JULW Sits at the deep end of the buffer scale. The fund aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses across a 12-month outcome period.allianzim.com
  • One slot in a 12-month ladder, so the July start date is a choice, not an inheritance. JULW has run that slot since its 2020 launch.allianzim.com
  • The 0.74% fee lands right at the median for 20% buffer funds on the S&P 500, not a premium for the insurer's name on the door.
  • Among the sturdier builds in its deep-buffer peer group, with no structural quirks flagged in our review.
  • PSFO 0.49% a year, below the median fee in its S&P 500 buffer cohort and well under peers like PMAY (0.79%) and BUFZ (0.95%).
  • Built to absorb the first 20% of a decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) over each outcome period before the fund itself starts taking losses.
  • A 1940 Act ETF holding its own option package, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits between you and the payoff. Running since 2021.
  • Rates in the upper tier of a two-dozen-fund group of S&P 500 buffer strategies, largely on price.

Worth knowing

  • JULW Buffer and cap are measured start to finish of each July outcome period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room is left, not the headline 20%.
  • The reference is the S&P 500 price index, so index dividends sit outside the math, and the fund is not built to pay income.
  • Cheaper ways to buy a 20% buffer exist: PBFR at 0.50% and PSFJ at 0.49%, against 0.74% here.
  • PSFO The price of the cushion: gains stop at a cap fixed at the start of each period, and the fund hasn't been an income payer.
  • Buffer and cap are engineered for the full October 1 to September 30 stretch. Buy mid-period and your real cushion and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • Small asset base and light trading, which usually means wider spreads and more attention needed on how orders get entered.

Full JULW profile⁠

Full PSFO profile⁠

JULW vs PSFO Holdings

How JULW and PSFO differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULW and 0.0% of PSFO.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in JULW and PSFO, widest gap first
SectorMore in JULWMore in PSFO
Consumer DiscretionaryPSFO +1.2 points
TechnologyJULW +1.0 points
Health CareJULW +1.1 points
CommunicationPSFO +0.7 points
EnergyJULW +0.3 points
FinancialsJULW +0.2 points
UtilitiesPSFO +0.2 points
IndustrialsPSFO +0.2 points
Consumer StaplesPSFO +0.1 points
Real EstatePSFO +0.1 points
MaterialsPSFO +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JULW and PSFO, widest gap first
CountryMore in JULWMore in PSFO
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JULW102.8%
  • PSFO104.6%

Securities held

  • JULW2
  • PSFO3

Asset class

JULW
Equity
PSFO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JULW2
  • In both0
  • Only in PSFO3

Only in JULW

2 securities, 100% of JULW by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 5.60 C98.71%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.10%

Only in PSFO

3 securities, 100% of PSFO by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 8.54 C97.78%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.63 P5.57%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 457.58 P0.57%

Weight gaps

JULW and PSFO share no securities.

All 5 JULW holdings⁠All 7 PSFO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULW vs PSFO Cost

Overpaying JULW vs PSFO

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULW 0.74%
  • PSFO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JULW $14,307PSFO $9,792

Year by year

YearJULWPSFOOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JULW
  • 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFO cheapest of 24 funds

JULW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

JULW vs PSFO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
JULW 0.00%
PSFO No data
Payout (12M)
JULW None
PSFO None

Distribution history

Per share, 2020, same scale for both

JULW1 paymentAll JULW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2020. Dec 15, 2020 $0.58. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502020
PSFOAll PSFO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULW vs PSFO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JULW
  • PSFO
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PSFO −12.1% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−3%−2%−1%0%Nov 2021Apr 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULW 5.4%, betterPSFO 6.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULW 1.41, betterPSFO 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULW −9.5%, betterPSFO −12.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULW 0.38PSFO 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • JULWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFOBvsPSFDB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.