PSFO ranks 3rd and JULW 12th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
JULW vs PSFO
0.0%by weight
PSFO −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
JULW 3.3×the volume
23.6K7.12K
PSFO +1.9pt
+8.9%+10.8%
JULW vs PSFO Performance
+53.0%+67.0%
- JULW 0.74%
- PSFO 0.49%, better
- JULW $254M
- PSFO $47M
- JULW +7.0%
- PSFO +11.2%, better
- JULW 0.00%
- PSFO
- JULW 2
- PSFO 4
- JULW 23.6K sh, better
- PSFO 7.12K sh
- JULW $41.45
- PSFO $35.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULW | PSFO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C49Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A77Higher | B59 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. JULW and PSFO are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULWC
PSFOB
In short
JULW JULW has held the July slot in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder since 2020: it aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses over each 12-month outcome period, with upside capped in exchange.
PSFO Pacer's October-dated buffer fund absorbs the first 20% of an S&P 500 drop over each 12-month period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside. At 0.49%, it charges less than the typical fund in its buffer peer group.
Stated mandate
JULW The Fund pursues a buffered outcome strategy intended to match the returns of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It seeks to protect the first 20% of index losses during the outcome period, while gains are limited by a cap.
PSFO The fund seeks to match the pre-fee and pre-expense returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULW vs PSFO Holdings
How JULW and PSFO differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULW and 0.0% of PSFO.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector97.4%
Sector
| Sector | More in JULWMore in PSFO | JULW | PSFO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | PSFO +1.2 points | 8.7% | 9.9% |
| Technology | JULW +1.0 points | 40.1% | 39.1% |
| Health Care | JULW +1.1 points | 9.4% | 8.3% |
| Communication | PSFO +0.7 points | 9.9% | 10.6% |
| Energy | JULW +0.3 points | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Financials | JULW +0.2 points | 11.3% | 11.1% |
| Utilities | PSFO +0.2 points | 1.9% | 2.1% |
| Industrials | PSFO +0.2 points | 7.6% | 7.8% |
| Consumer Staples | PSFO +0.1 points | 4.4% | 4.5% |
| Real Estate | PSFO +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Materials | PSFO +0.1 points | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JULWMore in PSFO | JULW | PSFO |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- JULW102.8%
- PSFO104.6%
- JULW2
- PSFO3
Asset class
- JULW
- Equity
- PSFO
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in JULW2
- In both0
- Only in PSFO3
Only in JULW
2 securities, 100% of JULW by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 5.60 C98.71%
- Spy 06/30/2027 746.84 P4.10%
Only in PSFO
3 securities, 100% of PSFO by weight
- Spy 09/30/2027 8.54 C97.78%
- Spy 09/30/2027 762.63 P5.57%
- Spy 09/30/2027 457.58 P0.57%
Weight gaps
JULW and PSFO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULW vs PSFO Cost
Overpaying JULW vs PSFO
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULW | PSFO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%JULW
- 0.49%PSFO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFO cheapest of 24 funds
JULW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
JULW vs PSFO Dividends
- JULW 0.00%
- PSFO
- JULW None
- PSFO None
Distribution history
JULW vs PSFO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JULW
- PSFO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULW 5.4%, betterPSFO 6.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULW 1.41, betterPSFO 1.38
- Worst fall
- JULW −9.5%, betterPSFO −12.1%
- Market sensitivity
- JULW 0.38PSFO 0.50
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.