Skip to content

JUSA vs MFIG

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF

MFIGCNasdaq

Overlap

20.1%by weight

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.32pt a year

JUSA0.18%MFIG0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 30.2×the volume

JUSA112KMFIG3.7K

JUSA vs MFIG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+9.8%JUSA0.0%MFIG

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. JUSA +9.8%. MFIG 0.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JUSA 0.18%, better
MFIG 0.50%
Fund size
JUSA $871M
MFIG $10M
1Y total return
JUSA +12.2%
MFIG No data
Yield (12M)
JUSA 0.72%
MFIG No data
Holdings
JUSA 264
MFIG 101
Avg volume (30D)
JUSA 112K sh, better
MFIG 3.7K sh
NAV per share
JUSA $65.95
MFIG $19.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 60, Holdings 83, Durability 77. MFIG: Cost 62, Risk 53, Mission 85, Tradability 38, Holdings 74, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUSA, MFIG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUSAMFIG
Cost30% weightA99HigherB62
Mission25% weightA84A85Higher
Risk15% weightA92HigherC53
Tradability15% weightB60HigherD38
Holdings10% weightA83HigherA74
Durability5% weightA77HigherD35

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUSA and MFIG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and MFIG 34th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 34BFBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 55
  4. Rank 34CMFIGMotley Fool Innovative Growth ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 34BTGRWT. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

MFIGCMotley Fool Innovative Growth ETF

In short

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

MFIG The Motley Fool's stock-picking philosophy, coded into a rules-based index. MFIG is a young US growth fund that follows an innovation screen instead of a manager's hunches, and charges 0.50% for the house view.

Stated mandate

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

MFIG The Fund seeks pre-expense total returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. It uses a passive indexing approach to track that index.

Why people hold it

  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.
  • MFIG Rules first: a published index selects holdings with an Innovative Growth Factor Score, so the Fool's growth style shows up as a repeatable screen, not discretion.
  • Plain plumbing: an all-US stock mandate in a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper, so 1099s rather than K-1s and daily creation and redemption.
  • The portfolio build is the sturdiest part of the package, holding up better against US growth peers than the price tag does.

Worth knowing

  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com
  • MFIG You pay up for the house view at 0.50%. Broad US growth funds like VUG and SCHG run at a few basis points, a gap that shows up every year.
  • Young and small: it launched in December 2025, and light trading in a small fund can mean wider spreads than the mega-ETFs.
  • Not an income story. The mandate is total return from innovative growth names, and distributions have not been part of the picture.

Full JUSA profile⁠

Full MFIG profile⁠

JUSA vs MFIG Holdings

How JUSA and MFIG differ

Overlap by weight

20.1%

Shared holdings make up 67.5% of MFIG and 25.0% of JUSA.

Level by level

  • Holdings30 in both20.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors64.9%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.9%

Sector

Sector weights in JUSA and MFIG, widest gap first
SectorMore in JUSAMore in MFIGGap
TechnologyMFIG +21.9 points
FinancialsJUSA +12.1 points
EnergyMFIG +8.0 points
CommunicationJUSA +6.0 points
IndustrialsJUSA +5.3 points
Health CareMFIG +5.3 points
Consumer StaplesJUSA +4.3 points
UtilitiesJUSA +2.4 points
Real EstateJUSA +1.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryJUSA +1.7 points
MaterialsJUSA +1.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JUSA and MFIG, widest gap first
CountryMore in JUSAMore in MFIGGap
United StatesMFIG +0.1 points
SwitzerlandJUSA +0.1 points
ChinaSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JUSA38.0%
  • MFIG45.6%

Securities held

  • JUSA262
  • MFIG100

Asset class

JUSA
Stocks
MFIG
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in JUSA232
  • In both30
  • Only in MFIG70

Only in JUSA

232 securities, 74.9% of JUSA by weight

  • Microsoft Corp Common6.64%
  • Amazon.com Inc Common4.38%
  • Alphabet Inc-Cl A -2.64%

Only in MFIG

70 securities, 32.0% of MFIG by weight

  • Gilead Sciences Inc4.70%
  • Adobe Inc2.50%
  • Airbnb Inc2.18%

Weight gaps

All 30 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in JUSA and MFIG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in JUSAMore in MFIGGap
Chevron Corp Common StockCVXMFIG +5.47 points
Exxonmobil Holdings CorpXOMMFIG +4.36 points
Cisco Systems Inc CommonCSCOMFIG +4.23 points
Crowdstrike Holdings IncCRWDMFIG +3.27 points
Snowflake Inc CommonSNOWMFIG +3.14 points
NVIDIA Corp Common StockNVDAJUSA +2.94 points
Lam Research Corp CommonLRCXMFIG +2.79 points
Advanced Micro DevicesAMDMFIG +2.73 points

All 262 JUSA holdings⁠All MFIG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUSA vs MFIG Cost

Overpaying MFIG vs JUSA

$6,230

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

  • MFIG 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUSA 0.18%
  • MFIG 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530MFIG $9,979JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearJUSAMFIGOverpaying
10$328$900$572
20$1,281$3,460$2,179
30$3,749$9,979$6,230

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • 0.50%MFIG
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

MFIG 33rd cheapest of 90 funds

JUSA vs MFIG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
JUSA 0.72%
MFIG No data
Payout (12M)
JUSA $0.49
MFIG None
Last payment
JUSA $0.13
MFIG No data
Ex-dividend
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
MFIG No data
Paid on
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
MFIG No data
Frequency
JUSA Quarterly
MFIG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202026YTD
MFIGAll MFIG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUSA vs MFIG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025MFIG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUSA 1.41since Apr 2025MFIG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025MFIG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUSA 0.98MFIG 1.06

JUSA and MFIG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • JUSAAvsGUSEA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFIGCvsGUSEA

    Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFIGCvsLRGCA

    Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFIGCvsFELGA

    Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.