Skip to content

LRGC vs MFIG

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF

MFIGCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

LRGC −0.11pt a year

LRGC0.39%MFIG0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 9.2×the volume

LRGC34KMFIG3.7K

LRGC vs MFIG Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+9.5%LRGC0.0%MFIG

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. LRGC +9.5%. MFIG 0.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%5%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LRGC 0.39%, better
MFIG 0.50%
Fund size
LRGC $1.33B
MFIG $10M
1Y total return
LRGC +11.6%
MFIG No data
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
MFIG No data
Holdings
LRGC 73
MFIG 101
Avg volume (30D)
LRGC 34K sh, better
MFIG 3.7K sh
NAV per share
LRGC $83.23
MFIG $19.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 92, Mission 79, Tradability 85, Holdings 77, Durability 79. MFIG: Cost 62, Risk 53, Mission 85, Tradability 38, Holdings 74, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRGC, MFIG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRGCMFIG
Cost30% weightA82HigherB62
Mission25% weightA79A85Higher
Risk15% weightA92HigherC53
Tradability15% weightA85HigherD38
Holdings10% weightA77HigherA74
Durability5% weightA79HigherD35

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRGC and MFIG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd and MFIG 34th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 83
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 82
  5. Rank 34BFBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 34CMFIGMotley Fool Innovative Growth ETFScore 55
  7. Rank 34BTGRWT. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

MFIGCMotley Fool Innovative Growth ETF

In short

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

MFIG The Motley Fool's stock-picking philosophy, coded into a rules-based index. MFIG is a young US growth fund that follows an innovation screen instead of a manager's hunches, and charges 0.50% for the house view.

Stated mandate

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

MFIG The Fund seeks pre-expense total returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. It uses a passive indexing approach to track that index.

Why people hold it

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com
  • MFIG Rules first: a published index selects holdings with an Innovative Growth Factor Score, so the Fool's growth style shows up as a repeatable screen, not discretion.
  • Plain plumbing: an all-US stock mandate in a standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper, so 1099s rather than K-1s and daily creation and redemption.
  • The portfolio build is the sturdiest part of the package, holding up better against US growth peers than the price tag does.

Worth knowing

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.
  • MFIG You pay up for the house view at 0.50%. Broad US growth funds like VUG and SCHG run at a few basis points, a gap that shows up every year.
  • Young and small: it launched in December 2025, and light trading in a small fund can mean wider spreads than the mega-ETFs.
  • Not an income story. The mandate is total return from innovative growth names, and distributions have not been part of the picture.

Full LRGC profile⁠

Full MFIG profile⁠

LRGC vs MFIG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRGC vs MFIG Cost

Overpaying MFIG vs LRGC

$2,081

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

  • MFIG 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRGC 0.39%
  • MFIG 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530MFIG $9,979LRGC $7,898

Year by year

YearLRGCMFIGOverpaying
10$705$900$195
20$2,725$3,460$735
30$7,898$9,979$2,081

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%LRGC, cheaper
  • 0.50%MFIG
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

MFIG 33rd cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC vs MFIG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRGC 0.53%
MFIG No data
Payout (12M)
LRGC $0.45
MFIG None
Last payment
LRGC $0.45
MFIG No data
Ex-dividend
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
MFIG No data
Paid on
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
MFIG No data
Frequency
LRGC Annual
MFIG No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
MFIGAll MFIG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGC vs MFIG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRGC 12.7%MFIG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRGC 1.26MFIG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023MFIG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRGC 1.00MFIG 1.06

LRGC and MFIG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFIGCvsJUSAA

    Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFIGCvsGUSEA

    Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MFIGCvsFELGA

    Motley Fool Innovative Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.