RISN ranks 4th and KAMO 25th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
KAMO vs RISN
RISN −0.20pt a year
0.92%0.72%
KAMO 1.6×the volume
23.4K14.8K
KAMO vs RISN Performance
−1.9%+7.2%
- KAMO 0.92%
- RISN 0.72%, better
- KAMO $107M
- RISN $69M
- KAMO
- RISN +4.8%
- KAMO
- RISN 1.05%
- KAMO 6
- RISN 53
- KAMO 23.4K sh, better
- RISN 14.8K sh
- KAMO $23.93
- RISN $30.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KAMO | RISN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | F12 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B58 | B68Higher |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. KAMO and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KAMOC
RISNA
In short
KAMO Most bond funds can only buy bonds. KAMO runs a quantitative credit strategy that takes long or short positions across global fixed income, dialing duration and credit risk up or down, and it charges a bit less than the typical tactical fund.
RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.
Stated mandate
KAMO The Fund seeks income and capital appreciation through an actively managed, quantitative fixed-income strategy that takes long or short positions across credit and other fixed-income segments while managing duration and credit risk.
RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KAMO vs RISN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KAMO vs RISN Cost
Overpaying KAMO vs RISN
$3,416
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KAMO 0.92%
$17,373
RISN 0.72%
$13,957
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KAMO | RISN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,627 | $1,284 | $343 |
| 20 | $6,138 | $4,888 | $1,250 |
| 30 | $17,373 | $13,957 | $3,416 |
- 0.92%KAMO
- 0.72%RISN, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds
KAMO 23rd cheapest of 46 funds
KAMO vs RISN Dividends
- KAMO
- RISN 1.05%
- KAMO
- RISN $0.32
- KAMO $0.29
- RISN $0.08
- KAMO Sep 30, 2026
- RISN Sep 25, 2026
- KAMO Oct 1, 2026
- RISN Oct 1, 2026
- KAMO Quarterly
- RISN Quarterly
Distribution history
KAMO vs RISN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KAMO RISN 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- KAMO RISN 0.77
- Worst fall
- KAMO RISN −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- KAMO 0.11RISN 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.92% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.92% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.