Skip to content

KAMO vs RISN

Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF

KAMOCCboe

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RISN −0.20pt a year

KAMO0.92%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

KAMO 1.6×the volume

KAMO23.4KRISN14.8K

KAMO vs RISN Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−1.9%KAMO+7.2%RISN

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. KAMO −1.9%. RISN +7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
KAMO 0.92%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
KAMO $107M
RISN $69M
1Y total return
KAMO No data
RISN +4.8%
Yield (12M)
KAMO No data
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
KAMO 6
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
KAMO 23.4K sh, better
RISN 14.8K sh
NAV per share
KAMO $23.93
RISN $30.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KAMO: Cost 53, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 12, Durability 58. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for KAMO, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKAMORISN
Cost30% weightC53A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA85
Risk15% weightB55HigherC46
Tradability15% weightA78HigherB64
Holdings10% weightF12A80Higher
Durability5% weightB58B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KAMO and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and KAMO 25th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 24CXFLXFundX Flexible ETFScore 54
  7. Rank 25CKAMOKensington Credit Opportunities ETFScore 53
  8. Rank 26CCLSMETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KAMOCKensington Credit Opportunities ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

KAMO Most bond funds can only buy bonds. KAMO runs a quantitative credit strategy that takes long or short positions across global fixed income, dialing duration and credit risk up or down, and it charges a bit less than the typical tactical fund.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

KAMO The Fund seeks income and capital appreciation through an actively managed, quantitative fixed-income strategy that takes long or short positions across credit and other fixed-income segments while managing duration and credit risk.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • KAMO The mandate is unusual for a bond ETF: long or short positions across credit and other fixed-income segments, with duration and credit risk actively managed instead of pinned to an index.
  • 0.92% a year, just under the 0.95% median for its tactical multi-asset cohort.
  • Pays quarterly, and the stated aim is income plus capital appreciation, not price return alone.
  • Stands in the upper half of its tactical peer group on our review.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • KAMO Launched in December 2025, so the live record is short and any read on how the model behaves through a full credit cycle rests on limited history.
  • It does not trade heavily. Limit orders and mid-session trading help keep spread costs in check.
  • 0.92% is a real fee in absolute terms, and a book that can sit long or short will behave differently from a plain bond index.
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full KAMO profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

KAMO vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KAMO vs RISN Cost

Overpaying KAMO vs RISN

$3,416

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KAMO 0.92%

    $17,373

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KAMO 0.92%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KAMO $17,373RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearKAMORISNOverpaying
10$1,627$1,284$343
20$6,138$4,888$1,250
30$17,373$13,957$3,416

Expense ratio

  • 0.92%KAMO
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

KAMO 23rd cheapest of 46 funds

KAMO vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
KAMO No data
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
KAMO No data
RISN $0.32
Last payment
KAMO $0.29
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
KAMO Sep 30, 2026
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
KAMO Oct 1, 2026
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
KAMO Quarterly
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

KAMOQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll KAMO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2025 $0.07; Mar 31, 2026 $0.21; Jun 30, 2026 $0.17; Sep 30, 2026 $0.29. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

KAMO vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KAMO No dataRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KAMO No dataRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KAMO No dataRISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KAMO 0.11RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • KAMOCvsENDWA

    Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KAMOCvsGMODA

    Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KAMOCvsPTBDA

    Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.92% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.