SETM ranks 4th and LITP 11th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.
LITP vs SETM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.65%0.65%
SETM 4.1×the volume
37.3K155K
SETM +28.6pt
−8.6%+20.0%
LITP vs SETM Performance
−14.5%+6.3%
- LITP 0.65%
- SETM 0.65%
- LITP $26M
- SETM $417M
- LITP −14.5%
- SETM +6.3%, better
- LITP 11.95%, better
- SETM 1.74%
- LITP 39
- SETM 158
- LITP 37.3K sh
- SETM 155K sh, better
- LITP $7.21
- SETM $24.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LITP | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | D38 |
| Mission | B64 | |
| Risk | F19 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | D34 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A80Higher |
| Durability | D38 | B64Higher |
Rank among Critical Materials funds
Same Category. LITP and SETM are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LITPD
SETMB
In short
LITP Lithium, undiluted. LITP tracks a rules-based Nasdaq Sprott index of roughly 40 lithium miners worldwide, rather than the broad metals grab bag most critical-materials funds hand you.
SETM Most funds in this corner pick a lane: lithium, or rare earths. SETM tracks an index built to span the wider critical-materials complex, roughly 160 miners and processors in a single basket.
Stated mandate
LITP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index.
SETM SETM seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LITP vs SETM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LITP vs SETM Cost
Same expense ratio
$12,717
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LITP 0.65%
$12,717
SETM 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LITP | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,163 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,440 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $12,717 |
- 0.65%LITP
- 0.65%SETM
- Middle half of Critical Materials funds
- Median 0.64%
LITP 7th cheapest of 12 funds
SETM 7th cheapest of 12 funds
LITP vs SETM Dividends
- LITP 11.95%, better
- SETM 1.74%
- LITP $0.89
- SETM $0.45
- LITP $0.89
- SETM $0.45
- LITP Dec 18, 2025
- SETM Dec 18, 2025
- LITP Dec 22, 2025
- SETM Dec 22, 2025
- LITP Annual
- SETM Annual
Distribution history
LITP vs SETM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LITP 50.4%SETM 36.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LITP −0.06SETM 0.49, better
- Worst fall
- LITP −74.8%SETM −42.8%
- Market sensitivity
- LITP 1.60SETM 1.22
LITP and SETM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

