Skip to content

LITP vs SETM

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

LITPDNasdaq

Sprott Critical Materials ETF

SETMBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

LITP0.65%SETM0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

SETM 4.1×the volume

LITP37.3KSETM155K

3Y return · a year

SETM +28.6pt

LITP−8.6%SETM+20.0%

LITP vs SETM Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

−14.5%LITP+6.3%SETM

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. LITP −14.5%. SETM +6.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.25%50%75%100%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LITP 0.65%
SETM 0.65%
Fund size
LITP $26M
SETM $417M
1Y total return
LITP −14.5%
SETM +6.3%, better
Yield (12M)
LITP 11.95%, better
SETM 1.74%
Holdings
LITP 39
SETM 158
Avg volume (30D)
LITP 37.3K sh
SETM 155K sh, better
NAV per share
LITP $7.21
SETM $24.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LITP: Cost 38, Risk 19, Mission 64, Tradability 34, Holdings 45, Durability 38. SETM: Cost 38, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 80, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for LITP, SETM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLITPSETM
Cost30% weightD38D38
Mission25% weightB64Not scored
Risk15% weightF19C51Higher
Tradability15% weightD34A81Higher
Holdings10% weightC45A80Higher
Durability5% weightD38B64Higher

Rank among Critical Materials funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LITP and SETM are both graded against the same 12 Critical Materials funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Critical Materials⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

SETM ranks 4th and LITP 11th of 12 funds in the Critical Materials Category.

  1. Rank 1AREMXVanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2BEARTGlobal X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BSETMSprott Critical Materials ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 5CEMETVanEck Copper and Green Metals ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 10CWDIGWisdomTree Efficient Rare Earth Plus Strategic Metals FundScore 40
  7. Rank 11DLITPSprott Lithium Miners ETFScore 34
  8. Rank 12DNIKLSprott Nickel Miners ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LITPDSprott Lithium Miners ETF

SETMBSprott Critical Materials ETF

In short

LITP Lithium, undiluted. LITP tracks a rules-based Nasdaq Sprott index of roughly 40 lithium miners worldwide, rather than the broad metals grab bag most critical-materials funds hand you.

SETM Most funds in this corner pick a lane: lithium, or rare earths. SETM tracks an index built to span the wider critical-materials complex, roughly 160 miners and processors in a single basket.

Stated mandate

LITP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index.

SETM SETM seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index.

Why people hold it

  • LITP One idea, cleanly expressed: a passive Nasdaq Sprott index of about 40 lithium miners globally, with no manager discretion over what gets in.
  • The 0.65% fee sits right at the median for critical-materials ETFs, so the narrow focus costs no more than the broad funds in the group.
  • Sprott runs it beside the wider SETM at the same 0.65% fee: one shop, two dial settings on critical materials.
  • Live since 2023, it is a pure miners basket, tracking the companies that dig lithium out of the ground rather than the whole battery supply chain.
  • SETM Peers narrow to one metal (ILIT for lithium, REMX and EART for rare earths). SETM holds roughly 160 miners and processors across the theme, in one rules-based index.
  • The 0.65% fee lands right at the middle of the critical-materials pack. Breadth here does not carry a premium price tag.
  • Real size for a niche theme, with regular daily volume behind it. That tends to mean easier fills than the thinnest shelves in mining ETFs.
  • Fully index-driven: the fund aims to match the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index before fees, so the holdings follow a published rulebook rather than a manager's call.

Worth knowing

  • LITP One commodity, one step in the chain. Roughly 40 miners tied to the lithium price tend to move as a pack, which makes for a bumpy ride.
  • ILIT covers the same lithium-miners lane for 0.47%, and PICK spans global metals and mining for 0.39%. Several peers in this group review more strongly overall.
  • A small fund with only moderate trading, and payouts come once or twice a year at most. Spreads and order type matter more here than in a mega-fund.
  • SETM Mining exposure comes cheaper elsewhere in the group: PICK runs 0.39%, REMX 0.53%. The extra basis points buy Sprott's particular definition of critical materials.
  • Miner shares move with commodity prices and government policy, so a single-theme equity basket can swing hard in both directions.
  • Income is not the job here. Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, not on a monthly rhythm.

Full LITP profile⁠

Full SETM profile⁠

LITP vs SETM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LITP vs SETM Cost

Same expense ratio

$12,717

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LITP 0.65%

    $12,717

  • SETM 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LITP 0.65%
  • SETM 0.65%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530LITP $12,717SETM $12,717

Year by year

YearLITPSETM
10$1,163$1,163
20$4,440$4,440
30$12,717$12,717

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%LITP
  • 0.65%SETM
  • Middle half of Critical Materials funds
  • Median 0.64%

LITP 7th cheapest of 12 funds

SETM 7th cheapest of 12 funds

LITP vs SETM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
LITP 11.95%, better
SETM 1.74%
Payout (12M)
LITP $0.89
SETM $0.45
Last payment
LITP $0.89
SETM $0.45
Ex-dividend
LITP Dec 18, 2025
SETM Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
LITP Dec 22, 2025
SETM Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
LITP Annual
SETM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

LITPAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LITP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2023 $0.35; Dec 12, 2024 $0.44; Dec 18, 2025 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
SETMAnnual · 3 paymentsAll SETM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 14, 2023 $0.44; Dec 12, 2024 $0.31; Dec 18, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

LITP vs SETM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LITP 50.4%SETM 36.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LITP −0.06SETM 0.49, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LITP −74.8%since Feb 2023SETM −42.8%since Feb 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LITP 1.60SETM 1.22

LITP and SETM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LITPDvsREMXA

    Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SETMBvsREMXA

    Sprott Critical Materials ETF · VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LITPDvsEARTB

    Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SETMBvsEARTB

    Sprott Critical Materials ETF · Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LITPDvsILITB

    Sprott Lithium Miners ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SETMBvsILITB

    Sprott Critical Materials ETF · iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.