Skip to content

MATR vs RISN

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

MATRBNYSE Arca

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

RISN −0.08pt a year

MATR0.80%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 20.5×the volume

MATR721RISN14.8K

3Y return · a year

MATR +1.9pt

MATR+15.2%RISN+13.3%

MATR vs RISN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+4.1%MATR+4.8%RISN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MATR +4.1%. RISN +4.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%7.5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MATR 0.80%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
MATR $10M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
MATR +4.1%
RISN +4.8%, better
Yield (12M)
MATR 2.88%, better
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
MATR 27
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
MATR 721 sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
MATR $26.94
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MATR: Cost 69, Risk 55, Mission 80, Tradability 40, Holdings 69, Durability 35. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for MATR, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMATRRISN
Cost30% weightB69A76Higher
Mission25% weightA80A85Higher
Risk15% weightB55HigherC46
Tradability15% weightC40B64Higher
Holdings10% weightB69A80Higher
Durability5% weightD35B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MATR and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and MATR 9th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63
  7. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 63
  8. Rank 11BHEFTHedgeye Fourth Turning ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MATRBHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

MATR Harbor's in-house macro team reads the business cycle, then sets the mix of stock, bond, commodity and currency ETFs to match it. A tactical allocation fund for investors who want the regime call outsourced, priced near the middle of its category.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

MATR The Fund seeks long-term total return while limiting downside risk. Its allocation is driven by regime modeling across multiple asset categories, including real estate investment trusts and commodities.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • MATR Growth, liquidity and inflation signals define the current business-cycle regime, and each regime maps to a distinct blend of equity, fixed income, commodity and currency funds.harborcapital.com
  • Run in-house by Harbor's Multi-Asset Solutions Team, with a bottom-up research layer on top of the systematic model rather than a pure black box.harborcapital.com
  • The prospectus pairs long-term total return with limiting downside risk, and reaches into corners a plain 60/40 skips: REITs, commodities, high yield, emerging markets.streetinsider.com
  • At 0.80% a year, an actively managed tactical strategy priced essentially at the allocation-category median.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • MATR Plain-vanilla allocation peers such as AOA and IRTR charge a fraction as much. The fee here buys the regime call, not the beta.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than in the category's giants.
  • Launched in 2023, so the regime model has a short live record, and results hinge on Harbor reading the cycle correctly.harborcapital.com
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full MATR profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

MATR vs RISN Holdings

How MATR and RISN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MATR and 0.0% of RISN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile64.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for MATR.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MATR and RISN, widest gap first
CountryMore in MATRMore in RISN
United StatesRISN +35.6 points
JapanMATR +11.8 points
TaiwanMATR +3.9 points
South KoreaMATR +2.5 points
ChinaMATR +2.4 points
United KingdomMATR +2.2 points
IndiaMATR +1.7 points
SwitzerlandMATR +1.4 points
Other countries (30)MATR +9.7 points

Outside the US: MATR 64% developed, 36% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MATR68.8%
  • RISN35.2%

Securities held

  • MATR27
  • RISN52

Asset class

MATR
Equity
RISN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in MATR27
  • In both0
  • Only in RISN52

Only in MATR

27 securities, 100% of MATR by weight

  • Ishares Core S&P 500 Etf14.64%
  • Ishares Core Msci Emerging9.37%
  • Franklin Ftse Japan Etf7.95%

Only in RISN

52 securities, 100% of RISN by weight

  • Wisdomtree Float19.09%
  • United Parcel-B1.82%
  • Home Depot Inc1.82%

Weight gaps

MATR and RISN share no securities.

All 24 MATR holdings⁠All RISN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MATR vs RISN Cost

Overpaying MATR vs RISN

$1,389

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MATR 0.80%

    $15,346

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MATR 0.80%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MATR $15,346RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearMATRRISNOverpaying
10$1,422$1,284$138
20$5,393$4,888$505
30$15,346$13,957$1,389

Expense ratio

  • 0.80%MATR
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

MATR 15th cheapest of 46 funds

MATR vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
MATR 2.88%, better
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
MATR $0.78
RISN $0.32
Last payment
MATR $0.78
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
MATR Dec 19, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
MATR Dec 24, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
MATR Annual
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

MATRAnnual · 3 paymentsAll MATR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2023 $0.57; Dec 20, 2024 $0.55; Dec 19, 2025 $0.78. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

MATR vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MATR 8.7%, betterRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MATR 1.17, betterRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MATR −12.9%since Sep 2023RISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MATR 0.62RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • MATRBvsENDWA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsGMODA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MATRBvsPTBDA

    Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.