NANR ranks 2nd and MGNR 11th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
MGNR vs NANR
NANR −0.40pt a year
0.75%0.35%
MGNR 6.4×the volume
184K28.6K
MGNR vs NANR Performance
+16.3%+37.0%
- MGNR 0.75%
- NANR 0.35%, better
- MGNR $1.23B
- NANR $826M
- MGNR +16.3%
- NANR +37.0%, better
- MGNR 0.85%
- NANR 1.67%, better
- MGNR 52
- NANR 204
- MGNR 184K sh, better
- NANR 28.6K sh
- MGNR $47.04
- NANR $85.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MGNR | NANR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A72 | |
| Risk | D29 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B58Higher | C53 |
| Durability | C52 | A81Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. MGNR and NANR are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MGNRD
NANRA
In short
MGNR An actively run slice of the companies that dig, drill and grow the world's raw materials, launched in 2024. Its peer group is stuffed with cheap broad-market core funds; this one is the specialist picking resource stocks by hand.
NANR Natural resources without the passport: roughly 200 large and mid cap US and Canadian energy, mining and agriculture names in one basket, for 0.35% a year.
Stated mandate
MGNR The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests primarily in equity securities of companies engaged in natural resources and related businesses.
NANR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It targets large- and mid-cap publicly traded U.S. and Canadian companies in energy, metals and mining, and agriculture-related natural-resources businesses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MGNR vs NANR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MGNR vs NANR Cost
Overpaying MGNR vs NANR
$7,356
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MGNR 0.75%
$14,482
NANR 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MGNR | NANR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $634 | $702 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $2,454 | $2,624 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $7,126 | $7,356 |
- 0.75%MGNR
- 0.35%NANR, cheaper
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
NANR cheapest of 14 funds
MGNR 13th cheapest of 14 funds
MGNR vs NANR Dividends
- MGNR 0.85%
- NANR 1.67%, better
- MGNR $0.40
- NANR $1.41
- MGNR $0.05
- NANR $0.71
- MGNR Oct 2, 2026
- NANR Jun 1, 2026
- MGNR Oct 6, 2026
- NANR Jun 3, 2026
- MGNR Quarterly
- NANR Twice a year
Distribution history
MGNR vs NANR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MGNR 23.0%NANR 19.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MGNR 0.98NANR 0.95
- Worst fall
- MGNR −22.1%NANR −26.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MGNR 0.74NANR 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.