ROM ranks 3rd and MQQQ 31st of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
MQQQ vs ROM
ROM −0.10pt a year
1.03%0.93%
ROM 1.00×the volume
47.5K47.7K
MQQQ vs ROM Performance
+4.8%+19.3%
- MQQQ 1.03%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- MQQQ $223M
- ROM $1.15B
- MQQQ +4.8%
- ROM +19.3%, better
- MQQQ 1.81%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- MQQQ 4
- ROM 85
- MQQQ 47.5K sh
- ROM 47.7K sh, better
- MQQQ $201.87
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MQQQ | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A84 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D33 | |
| Durability | B61 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. MQQQ and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MQQQC
ROMA
In short
MQQQ Most leveraged ETFs reset every single day. MQQQ runs on the calendar instead, aiming for twice the Invesco QQQ Trust's return over a full calendar month, before fees and expenses, for 1.03%.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
MQQQ MQQQ seeks calendar-month investment results equal to twice the performance of the Invesco QQQ Trust, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a full calendar-month holding period rather than a different period.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MQQQ vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MQQQ vs ROM Cost
Overpaying MQQQ vs ROM
$1,634
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MQQQ 1.03%
$19,173
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MQQQ | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,814 | $1,644 | $170 |
| 20 | $6,807 | $6,199 | $608 |
| 30 | $19,173 | $17,539 | $1,634 |
- 1.03%MQQQ
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
MQQQ 78th cheapest of 95 funds
MQQQ vs ROM Dividends
- MQQQ 1.81%, better
- ROM 0.03%
- MQQQ $3.66
- ROM $0.04
- MQQQ $3.66
- ROM $0.02
- MQQQ Dec 23, 2025
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- MQQQ Dec 26, 2025
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- MQQQ Annual
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
MQQQ vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MQQQ 38.2%ROM 49.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- MQQQ 0.68ROM 0.97
- Worst fall
- MQQQ −42.2%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- MQQQ 2.65ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 1.03% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.