ROM ranks 3rd and MSOX 79th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
MSOX vs ROM
ROM −0.04pt a year
0.97%0.93%
MSOX 40.0×the volume
1.91M47.7K
ROM +118.1pt
−67.5%+50.6%
MSOX vs ROM Performance
−71.9%+26.5%
- MSOX 0.97%
- ROM 0.93%, better
- MSOX $42M
- ROM $1.15B
- MSOX −71.9%
- ROM +26.5%, better
- MSOX
- ROM 0.03%
- MSOX 7
- ROM 85
- MSOX 1.91M sh, better
- ROM 47.7K sh
- MSOX $1.77
- ROM $132.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSOX | ROM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A70Higher |
| Mission | C46 | |
| Risk | F14 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. MSOX and ROM are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSOXD
ROMA
In short
MSOX Two times the daily move of AdvisorShares' US cannabis fund, built with swaps. It is the leveraged expression of one of the market's most volatile sector trades, reset every single day.
ROM The original 2x tech trade. Since 2007, ROM has aimed at twice the daily move of the S&P 500's technology sector: a double dose in a category now stacked with triples.
Stated mandate
MSOX The Fund seeks approximately twice the daily total return of the US Cannabis ETF before fees and expenses, using swap agreements and other leveraged techniques to pursue that daily objective.
ROM ROM seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to twice the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector SM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSOX vs ROM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSOX vs ROM Cost
Overpaying MSOX vs ROM
$659
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSOX 0.97%
$18,198
ROM 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSOX | ROM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,644 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $6,199 | $244 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $17,539 | $659 |
- 0.97%MSOX
- 0.93%ROM, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
ROM 29th cheapest of 95 funds
MSOX 68th cheapest of 95 funds
MSOX vs ROM Dividends
- MSOX
- ROM 0.03%
- MSOX None
- ROM $0.04
- MSOX
- ROM $0.02
- MSOX
- ROM Mar 25, 2026
- MSOX
- ROM Mar 31, 2026
- MSOX
- ROM Quarterly
Distribution history
MSOX vs ROM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSOX 176.4%ROM 49.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MSOX −0.04ROM 0.97, better
- Worst fall
- MSOX −99.7%ROM −67.6%
- Market sensitivity
- MSOX 1.15ROM 3.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.