Skip to content

NAPR vs NJUL

Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

NAPRCCboe

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

NJULCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

NAPR0.79%NJUL0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

NJUL 3.9×the volume

NAPR5.42KNJUL21.4K

5Y return · a year

NJUL +0.3pt

NAPR+9.4%NJUL+9.7%

NAPR vs NJUL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+56.9%NAPR+58.6%NJUL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. NAPR +56.9%. NJUL +58.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NAPR 0.79%
NJUL 0.79%
Fund size
NAPR $205M
NJUL $269M
1Y total return
NAPR +13.5%, better
NJUL +4.9%
Holdings
NAPR 3
NJUL 3
Avg volume (30D)
NAPR 5.42K sh
NJUL 21.4K sh, better
NAV per share
NAPR $60.28
NJUL $75.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NAPR: Cost 39, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings not scored, Durability 79. NJUL: Cost 39, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings not scored, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for NAPR, NJUL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNAPRNJUL
Cost30% weightD39D39
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherC42
Tradability15% weightB58A78Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA79A87Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NAPR and NJUL are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

NAPR ranks 4th and NJUL 4th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 3CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CNAPRInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 52
  6. Rank 6CNJUNInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NAPRCInnovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April

NJULCInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

In short

NAPR A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100. NAPR aims to absorb the first 15% of losses in the Nasdaq-100 ETF it references over each April-to-March stretch, in exchange for a ceiling on gains that is reset every April.

NJUL Nasdaq-100 exposure with a seatbelt. NJUL absorbs the first 15% of QQQ's losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each July, and in exchange accepts a ceiling on the upside set the day the period begins.

Stated mandate

NAPR The Fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

NJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • NAPR Deep cushion by design: the structure targets the first 15 percentage points of reference-ETF losses over the outcome period, so you take the hit only past that line.innovatoretfs.com
  • It rolls instead of expiring. Every April 1 the buffer resets and a fresh cap is struck for the next twelve months, so the position keeps running without you rebuilding it.innovatoretfs.com
  • Running since 2020, this April vintage has several completed outcome periods behind it, back when defined-outcome funds were still a curiosity rather than a shelf.
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for Nasdaq-100 buffer funds, and the overall build lands in the upper half of that peer group.
  • NJUL The contract is written down, not implied: a 15-point cushion against QQQ's decline over the outcome period, with the trade-off stated in the prospectus.
  • The clock resets every July 1. Investors who start with a fresh period know the buffer and the cap before they commit, rather than guessing at the risk.
  • A plain 1940 Act ETF, not a bank-issued structured note, so the defined outcome doesn't ride on a single issuer's credit.
  • Live since 2020, with siblings NJAN and NAPR running the same Nasdaq-100 buffer recipe at the same 0.79% on different reset dates.

Worth knowing

  • NAPR The cushion is paid for with a ceiling. Upside is capped at a level struck each April, so a blistering Nasdaq year above that cap is return you watch rather than collect.innovatoretfs.com
  • Terms are built for the full April-to-March period. Buy mid-period and your personal cushion and ceiling differ from the headline numbers, sometimes a lot.innovatoretfs.com
  • Mid-pack on cost, not cheap: PBQQ runs 0.50% and the Calamos Nasdaq-100 series 0.69%. Shares also trade thinly, which can widen the spread at the point of entry.
  • NJUL The ceiling is real. The cap is fixed when each period starts, so a runaway Nasdaq year leaves gains on the table.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the headline 15%. Full terms belong to holders who own from the reset date.
  • At 0.79% it matches the typical Nasdaq-100 buffer fund, but sits above PBQQ at 0.50% and the Calamos series at 0.69%, and it isn't among the group's busiest tickers.

Full NAPR profile⁠

Full NJUL profile⁠

NAPR vs NJUL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NAPR vs NJUL Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NAPR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • NJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NAPR 0.79%
  • NJUL 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NAPR $15,174NJUL $15,174

Year by year

YearNAPRNJUL
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NAPR
  • 0.79%NJUL
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

NAPR 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NJUL 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NAPR vs NJUL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
NAPR None
NJUL None

Distribution history

NAPRAll NAPR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NJULAll NJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NAPR vs NJUL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • NAPR
  • NJUL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: NAPR −16.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NAPR 7.2%, betterNJUL 8.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NAPR 1.13, betterNJUL 1.09
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NAPR −16.5%NJUL −14.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NAPR 0.48NJUL 0.58

Popular comparisons

  • NAPRCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJULCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NAPRCvsNJANC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJULCvsNJANC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NAPRCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Nasdaq 100 Power Buffer ETF - April · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NJULCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.