Skip to content

NICO vs PAWZ

Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF

NICODNYSE Arca

ProShares Pet Care ETF

PAWZCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PAWZ −0.20pt a year

NICO0.70%PAWZ0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

PAWZ 1.5×the volume

NICO1.13KPAWZ1.74K

NICO vs PAWZ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.2%NICO+3.4%PAWZ

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. NICO +7.2%. PAWZ +3.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NICO 0.70%
PAWZ 0.50%, better
Fund size
NICO $2M
PAWZ $33M
1Y total return
NICO No data
PAWZ −3.0%
Yield (12M)
NICO No data
PAWZ 0.70%
Holdings
NICO 17
PAWZ 28
Avg volume (30D)
NICO 1.13K sh
PAWZ 1.74K sh, better
NAV per share
NICO $28.14
PAWZ $52.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NICO: Cost 12, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 43, Holdings not scored, Durability 34. PAWZ: Cost 70, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings 16, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for NICO, PAWZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNICOPAWZ
Cost30% weightF12A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherC45
Tradability15% weightC43C52Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredF16
Durability5% weightD34B62Higher

Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NICO and PAWZ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Consumer Lifestyle⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

PAWZ ranks 3rd and NICO 10th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.

  1. Rank 1BMILNGlobal X Millennial Consumer ETFScore 68
  2. Rank 2BPEJInvesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3CPAWZProShares Pet Care ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 4CGENZVanEck Digital Native Economy ETFScore 44
  5. Rank 7CTSICTruth Social American Icons ETF Amrn Icons ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 10DNICOHexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NICODHexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF

PAWZCProShares Pet Care ETF

In short

NICO Most staples funds own tobacco as a sliver next to soap and soda. This one makes it the whole trade: active management, a global mandate, and at least 80% of assets in tobacco and nicotine companies.

PAWZ One ticker for the pet economy: vet clinics, kibble makers, animal-health labs, the retailers that ship it all. PAWZ has tracked the FactSet Pet Care Index, globally, since 2018.

Stated mandate

NICO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active management, normally investing at least 80% of net assets in companies engaged in the global tobacco and nicotine sectors.

PAWZ The fund invests globally in companies positioned at the forefront of the pet care industry.

Why people hold it

  • NICO Pure-play by design: at least 80% of net assets go to global tobacco and nicotine names, not a slice of a diversified staples basket.
  • Actively managed rather than index-tracking, with a global remit, so the manager can pick across markets instead of following a fixed weighting.
  • Standard 1940 Act ETF plumbing: it trades like any ordinary stock fund, and shareholders get a 1099 rather than a K-1.sec.gov
  • PAWZ Costs 0.50% a year, under the 0.65% median for its consumer-lifestyle peer group. Cheap for a niche theme fund, where 0.60%-plus is the norm.
  • Buys the whole pet supply chain, not one slice: the mandate is global companies at the forefront of pet care, set by the FactSet Pet Care Index rather than a manager's hunches.proshares.com
  • Running since 2018 and priced level with the strongest names in its cohort (MILN at 0.50%), it sits in the upper half of that peer group on our review.

Worth knowing

  • NICO 0.70% a year is the price of active, single-theme access; the broad staples index funds in its group (XLP, VDC, FSTA) charge under a tenth of a percent.
  • A small, thinly traded fund since its 2026 launch, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the giant staples funds.
  • Income is not the mandate here: the objective is long-term capital appreciation, and regular payouts have not been a feature of the fund.
  • PAWZ Thinly traded. On a given trade the bid-ask spread can cost more than a year of the expense ratio, so how you place the order matters.
  • Around two dozen holdings. Concentration is the point of a theme fund and also the risk: one company's news can swing the whole basket.
  • A small fund with a global mandate, so expect foreign listings, currency movement, and an asset base that keeps it off most institutional buy lists.

Full NICO profile⁠

Full PAWZ profile⁠

NICO vs PAWZ Holdings

How NICO and PAWZ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NICO and 0.0% of PAWZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile53.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for NICO.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in NICO and PAWZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in NICOMore in PAWZ
United KingdomNICO +31.2 points
United StatesPAWZ +25.0 points
FrancePAWZ +7.5 points
South KoreaNICO +7.1 points
JapanNICO +5.3 points
SwitzerlandPAWZ +4.6 points
CanadaPAWZ +4.5 points
SwedenPAWZ +3.2 points
Other countries (4)NICO +1.3 points

Outside the US: NICO 87% developed, 13% emerging. PAWZ 95% developed, 5% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • NICO121.7%
  • PAWZ70.7%

Securities held

  • NICO13
  • PAWZ27

Asset class

NICO
Equity
PAWZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in NICO13
  • In both0
  • Only in PAWZ27

Only in NICO

13 securities, 96.3% of NICO by weight

  • First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204031.51%
  • British American Tobacco PLC15.37%
  • Philip Morris International Inc15.28%

Only in PAWZ

27 securities, 99.5% of PAWZ by weight

  • Chewy Inc - Class A10.34%
  • Zoetis Inc9.81%
  • Idexx Laboratories Inc9.79%

Weight gaps

NICO and PAWZ share no securities.

All NICO holdings⁠All 29 PAWZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NICO vs PAWZ Cost

Overpaying NICO vs PAWZ

$3,627

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NICO 0.70%

    $13,606

  • PAWZ 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NICO 0.70%
  • PAWZ 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530NICO $13,606PAWZ $9,979

Year by year

YearNICOPAWZOverpaying
10$1,250$900$350
20$4,760$3,460$1,300
30$13,606$9,979$3,627

Expense ratio

  • 0.70%NICO
  • 0.50%PAWZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
  • Median 0.54%

PAWZ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds

NICO 10th cheapest of 10 funds

NICO vs PAWZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NICO No data
PAWZ 0.70%
Payout (12M)
NICO None
PAWZ $0.36
Last payment
NICO No data
PAWZ $0.06
Ex-dividend
NICO No data
PAWZ Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
NICO No data
PAWZ Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
NICO No data
PAWZ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

NICOAll NICO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PAWZQuarterly · 30 paymentsAll PAWZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 30 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 25, 2019 $0.09; Dec 24, 2019 $0.05; Mar 25, 2020 $0.01; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.03; Dec 23, 2020 $0.04; Mar 23, 2021 $0.03; Jun 22, 2021 $0.06; Sep 22, 2021 $0.01; Dec 23, 2021 $0.05; Mar 23, 2022 $0.04; Jun 22, 2022 $0.05; Sep 21, 2022 $0.06; Dec 22, 2022 $0.11; Mar 22, 2023 $0.04; Jun 21, 2023 $0.05; Sep 20, 2023 $0.09; Dec 20, 2023 $0.05; Jun 26, 2024 $0.18; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 23, 2024 $0.13; Mar 26, 2025 $0.07; Jun 25, 2025 $0.24; Sep 24, 2025 $0.04; Dec 24, 2025 $0.09; Mar 25, 2026 $0.05; Jun 24, 2026 $0.17; Sep 23, 2026 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.25202020232026YTD

NICO vs PAWZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NICO No dataPAWZ 21.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NICO No dataPAWZ 0.24
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NICO No dataPAWZ −50.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NICO −1.38PAWZ 1.05

Popular comparisons

  • NICODvsMILNB

    Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAWZCvsMILNB

    ProShares Pet Care ETF · Global X Millennial Consumer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NICODvsPEJB

    Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAWZCvsPEJB

    ProShares Pet Care ETF · Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NICODvsGENZC

    Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.70% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PAWZCvsGENZC

    ProShares Pet Care ETF · VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.