PAWZ ranks 3rd and NICO 10th of 10 funds in the Consumer Lifestyle Category.
NICO vs PAWZ
0.0%by weight
PAWZ −0.20pt a year
0.70%0.50%
PAWZ 1.5×the volume
1.13K1.74K
NICO vs PAWZ Performance
+7.2%+3.4%
- NICO 0.70%
- PAWZ 0.50%, better
- NICO $2M
- PAWZ $33M
- NICO
- PAWZ −3.0%
- NICO
- PAWZ 0.70%
- NICO 17
- PAWZ 28
- NICO 1.13K sh
- PAWZ 1.74K sh, better
- NICO $28.14
- PAWZ $52.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | NICO | PAWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A79Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | C43 | C52Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | |
| Durability | D34 | B62Higher |
Rank among Consumer Lifestyle funds
Same Category. NICO and PAWZ are both graded against the same 10 Consumer Lifestyle funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
NICOD
PAWZC
In short
NICO Most staples funds own tobacco as a sliver next to soap and soda. This one makes it the whole trade: active management, a global mandate, and at least 80% of assets in tobacco and nicotine companies.
PAWZ One ticker for the pet economy: vet clinics, kibble makers, animal-health labs, the retailers that ship it all. PAWZ has tracked the FactSet Pet Care Index, globally, since 2018.
Stated mandate
NICO The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active management, normally investing at least 80% of net assets in companies engaged in the global tobacco and nicotine sectors.
PAWZ The fund invests globally in companies positioned at the forefront of the pet care industry.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
NICO vs PAWZ Holdings
How NICO and PAWZ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of NICO and 0.0% of PAWZ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
- Country53.2%
Sector
No Sector split for NICO.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in NICOMore in PAWZ | NICO | PAWZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | NICO +31.2 points | 40.9% | 9.7% |
| United States | PAWZ +25.0 points | 40.2% | 65.2% |
| France | PAWZ +7.5 points | 0.0% | 7.5% |
| South Korea | NICO +7.1 points | 7.1% | 0.0% |
| Japan | NICO +5.3 points | 7.8% | 2.5% |
| Switzerland | PAWZ +4.6 points | 0.0% | 4.6% |
| Canada | PAWZ +4.5 points | 0.0% | 4.5% |
| Sweden | PAWZ +3.2 points | 0.8% | 4.0% |
| Other countries (4) | NICO +1.3 points | 3.2% | 1.9% |
Outside the US: NICO 87% developed, 13% emerging. PAWZ 95% developed, 5% emerging.
Concentration
- NICO121.7%
- PAWZ70.7%
- NICO13
- PAWZ27
Asset class
- NICO
- Equity
- PAWZ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in NICO13
- In both0
- Only in PAWZ27
Only in NICO
13 securities, 96.3% of NICO by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204031.51%
- British American Tobacco PLC15.37%
- Philip Morris International Inc15.28%
- Imperial Brands PLC10.40%
- Altria Group Inc10.37%
- Japan Tobacco Inc4.90%
- KT&G Corp4.65%
- Scandinavian Tobacco Group A/S0.90%
- British American Tobacco PLC0.81%
- RLX Technology Inc0.81%
- Haypp Group AB0.52%
- Turning Point Brands Inc0.38%
- Smoore International Holdings Ltd0.38%
Only in PAWZ
27 securities, 99.5% of PAWZ by weight
- Chewy Inc - Class A10.34%
- Zoetis Inc9.81%
- Idexx Laboratories Inc9.79%
- Freshpet Inc9.70%
- Virbac SA7.53%
- Pets At Home Group PLC4.84%
- Trupanion Inc4.79%
- Cvs Group PLC4.75%
- Nestle Sa-Reg4.65%
- Pet Valu Holdings Ltd4.52%
- Merck & Co. Inc.4.25%
- Vimian Group Ab4.03%
- Oil-Dri Corp of America3.45%
- Colgate-Palmolive Co2.94%
- Cencora Inc2.44%
- Petco Health and Wellness Co2.43%
- Anicom Holdings Inc2.24%
- Central Garden & Pet Co2.24%
- I-Tail Corp Pcl-Nvdr1.88%
- General Mills Inc0.71%
- Tractor Supply Company0.69%
- Jm Smucker Co/The0.53%
- Elanco Animal Health Inc0.45%
- Unicharm Corp0.27%
- Post Holdings Inc0.13%
- Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc0.07%
- Arata Corp0.02%
Weight gaps
NICO and PAWZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
NICO vs PAWZ Cost
Overpaying NICO vs PAWZ
$3,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
NICO 0.70%
$13,606
PAWZ 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | NICO | PAWZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $900 | $350 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $3,460 | $1,300 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $9,979 | $3,627 |
- 0.70%NICO
- 0.50%PAWZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Consumer Lifestyle funds
- Median 0.54%
PAWZ 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
NICO 10th cheapest of 10 funds
NICO vs PAWZ Dividends
- NICO
- PAWZ 0.70%
- NICO None
- PAWZ $0.36
- NICO
- PAWZ $0.06
- NICO
- PAWZ Sep 23, 2026
- NICO
- PAWZ Sep 29, 2026
- NICO
- PAWZ Quarterly
Distribution history
NICO vs PAWZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- NICO PAWZ 21.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- NICO PAWZ 0.24
- Worst fall
- NICO PAWZ −50.1%
- Market sensitivity
- NICO −1.38PAWZ 1.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.