Skip to content

NMBL vs RISN

NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF

NMBLDNYSE Arca

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

RISN −1.27pt a year

NMBL1.99%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

RISN 8.9×the volume

NMBL1.66KRISN14.8K

NMBL vs RISN Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.0%NMBL+7.2%RISN

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. NMBL +3.0%. RISN +7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%5%10%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
NMBL 1.99%
RISN 0.72%, better
Fund size
NMBL $24M
RISN $70M
1Y total return
NMBL No data
RISN +4.8%
Yield (12M)
NMBL No data
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
NMBL 45
RISN 53
Avg volume (30D)
NMBL 1.66K sh
RISN 14.8K sh, better
NAV per share
NMBL $20.38
RISN $31.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NMBL: Cost 0, Risk 38, Mission 82, Tradability 17, Holdings 79, Durability 33. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 46, Mission 85, Tradability 64, Holdings 80, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for NMBL, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNMBLRISN
Cost30% weightF0A76Higher
Mission25% weightA82A85Higher
Risk15% weightD38C46Higher
Tradability15% weightF17B64Higher
Holdings10% weightA79A80Higher
Durability5% weightD33B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NMBL and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 4th and NMBL 38th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 5BPBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 38DGHTAGoose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 38DNMBLNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETFScore 38
  8. Rank 40DHFDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NMBLDNovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

NMBL A go-anywhere active fund: stocks, bonds, any country, emerging markets included, with no fixed allocation to defend. Launched in 2025, it charges 1.99% a year for that freedom.

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

NMBL The Fund seeks capital appreciation through active management across multiple asset classes and countries worldwide, including emerging markets.

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

  • NMBL Genuinely unconstrained: the mandate lets management move across asset classes and countries, emerging markets included, instead of defending a fixed 60/40 split.
  • What it owns matches what it promises: the portfolio lines up closely with the global multi-asset mandate written into its prospectus.
  • Plain 1940 Act ETF plumbing: daily liquidity, 1099 tax reporting, no leverage or exotic wrapper bolted onto the strategy.
  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

  • NMBL The fee is the hurdle. At 1.99% a year it sits at the top of the tactical allocation range, where ENDW charges 0.22% and ONOF 0.39%.
  • Launched in 2025, so you are judging a process, not a record. It is also a small fund that trades lightly, which can widen bid-ask spreads.
  • Built around capital appreciation, not cash flow: distributions land once or twice a year rather than monthly or quarterly.
  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full NMBL profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

NMBL vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NMBL vs RISN Cost

Overpaying NMBL vs RISN

$18,822

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NMBL 1.99%

    $32,779

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NMBL 1.99%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K$40K051015202530NMBL $32,779RISN $13,957

Year by year

YearNMBLRISNOverpaying
10$3,367$1,284$2,083
20$12,113$4,888$7,225
30$32,779$13,957$18,822

Expense ratio

  • 1.99%NMBL
  • 0.72%RISN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

NMBL 46th cheapest of 46 funds

NMBL vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
NMBL No data
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
NMBL No data
RISN $0.32
Last payment
NMBL $0.18
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
NMBL Dec 23, 2025
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
NMBL Dec 24, 2025
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
NMBL Irregular
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

NMBLIrregular · 1 paymentAll NMBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

NMBL vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NMBL No dataRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NMBL No dataRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NMBL No dataRISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NMBL 0.66RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • NMBLDvsENDWA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NMBLDvsGMODA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsGMODA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • NMBLDvsPTBDA

    NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.99% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.